LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-34696: Cisco ASR 900 and ASR 920 Series Aggregation Services Routers Access Control List Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the access control list (ACL) programming of Cisco ASR 900 and ASR 920 Series Aggregation Services Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured ACL. This vulnerability is due to incorrect programming of hardware when an ACL is configured using a method other than the configuration CLI. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by attempting to send traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass an ACL on the affected device.

MediumCVSS 5.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Some Cisco ASR 900 and ASR 920 routers may fail to enforce configured access control lists when those ACLs were configured outside the CLI. This can let unauthorized network traffic pass through controls the business expects to block.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate network-control risk. It may undermine segmentation or filtering assumptions on affected edge or aggregation routers, but available sources do not show active exploitation or broad product impact beyond Cisco ASR 900 and ASR 920 guidance.

Technical view

CVE-2021-34696 is an unauthenticated remote ACL bypass in Cisco IOS XE Software on ASR 900 and ASR 920 routers. The issue is incorrect hardware programming when ACLs are configured by non-CLI methods. Successful exploitation affects integrity of traffic filtering, not confidentiality or availability per CVSS.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in organizations using Cisco ASR 900 or ASR 920 routers with ACLs provisioned through automation, management systems, or other non-CLI configuration paths. The source bundle does not provide affected version ranges.

Exploitation context

The CVE describes remote unauthenticated exploitation by sending traffic through an affected device. The source bundle marks CISA KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation or public weaponization.

Researcher notes

The key technical condition is ACL programming via methods other than the configuration CLI, causing incorrect hardware programming. Sources do not include exact affected IOS XE versions, fixed releases, or workaround details in the bundle, so remediation should be tied to Cisco's advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for affected releases and fixed-software guidance.
  • Inventory ASR 900 and ASR 920 routers running Cisco IOS XE Software.
  • Identify ACLs configured through non-CLI management or automation paths.
  • Prioritize remediation for routers enforcing boundary, tenant, or management-plane filtering.
  • Check vendor guidance before relying on workaround assumptions.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether deployed ASR 900 or ASR 920 models match Cisco's advisory scope.
  • Review configuration management records for ACLs created outside the CLI.
  • Verify ACL behavior after applying vendor-recommended remediation.
  • Monitor for traffic unexpectedly allowed across protected router interfaces.
  • Document affected devices with unknown IOS XE version status.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-34696 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.8Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-34696Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco IOS XE Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.