LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-34657: TypoFR <= 0.11 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting

The 2TypoFR WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the text function found in the ~/vendor/Org_Heigl/Hyphenator/index.php file which allows attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts, in versions up to and including 0.11.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-34657 is a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the TypoFR WordPress plugin through version 0.11. An attacker could trick a user into opening a crafted link that runs script in the victim's browser. The main business risk is account or session misuse and content tampering, not server takeover.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate web exposure issue. Prioritize externally accessible WordPress sites, especially those with authenticated business users or admin sessions. It is not reported as actively exploited in the provided sources, but remediation is still appropriate because exploitation is low-complexity with user interaction.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-79 reflected XSS in the plugin's Hyphenator component, specifically the text function in vendor/Org_Heigl/Hyphenator/index.php. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.1, with network access, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, and low confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the TypoFR or 2TypoFR plugin at version 0.11 or earlier. The bundle does not identify other affected products, deployments, or fixed versions.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV inclusion or cite active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction, such as a victim visiting attacker-controlled content that reaches the vulnerable reflected XSS path.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports reflected XSS only. Do not assume stored XSS, unauthenticated server compromise, or broader WordPress impact. The bundle does not name a fixed version, so remediation guidance should remain tied to vendor or WordPress plugin advisories.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for TypoFR or 2TypoFR version 0.11 or earlier.
  • Check Wordfence and WordPress plugin guidance for a fixed version or removal advice.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not business-critical.
  • Apply vendor-recommended updates if an official fixed release is available.
  • Review WAF or browser protections as compensating controls only.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether TypoFR or 2TypoFR is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record installed plugin versions and flag version 0.11 or earlier.
  • Review plugin files for the referenced Hyphenator component path.
  • Check logs for suspicious requests to the referenced plugin component.
  • Verify remediation by confirming the plugin is updated, disabled, or removed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-34657 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-34657Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TypoFRTypoFR0.11Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.