LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-34579: PHOENIX CONTACT: FL MGUARD DM version 1.12.0 and 1.13.0 Improper Privilege Management

In Phoenix Contact: FL MGUARD DM version 1.12.0 and 1.13.0 access to the Apache web server being installed as part of the FL MGUARD DM on Microsoft Windows does not require login credentials even if configured during installation.Attackers with network access to the Apache web server can download and therefore read mGuard configuration profiles (“ATV profiles”). Such configuration profiles may contain sensitive information, e.g. private keys associated with IPsec VPN connections.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Phoenix Contact FL MGUARD DM 1.12.0 and 1.13.0 can expose configuration profiles through its bundled Apache web server without requiring login. Those profiles may contain sensitive VPN material, including private keys. This is primarily a confidentiality issue, but the exposed data could enable further compromise of protected networks.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for environments relying on mGuard VPN configurations. The main business risk is credential and key exposure, which can undermine network segmentation and remote-access trust even without direct code execution.

Technical view

CVE-2021-34579 is improper privilege management in FL MGUARD DM for Microsoft Windows. Network-accessible Apache content does not enforce configured login credentials, allowing unauthenticated reading of mGuard ATV configuration profiles. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5, driven by network access, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running PHOENIX CONTACT FL MGUARD DM 2981974 versions 1.12.0 or 1.13.0 on Microsoft Windows, especially where the bundled Apache web server is reachable from untrusted networks.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The issue is still serious because unauthenticated network access may disclose VPN configuration profiles and private keys.

Researcher notes

Affected scope is explicitly versions 1.12.0 and 1.13.0, with default status otherwise unaffected. The provided evidence names information disclosure through unauthenticated Apache access, not integrity or availability impact. Patch details are not included in the bundle, so remediation should be confirmed against vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all FL MGUARD DM 1.12.0 and 1.13.0 Windows installations.
  • Check the Phoenix Contact/VDE advisory for vendor remediation or upgrade guidance.
  • Restrict network reachability to the bundled Apache web server.
  • Review exposed ATV profiles for sensitive VPN keys or credentials.
  • Rotate potentially exposed IPsec private keys after assessing access.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed FL MGUARD DM version and Windows deployment status.
  • Inventory hosts exposing the bundled Apache web server.
  • Verify whether authentication is actually enforced before profile access.
  • Review logs for unexpected access to ATV profile files.
  • Check whether any exposed profiles contain private keys.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-34579 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-34579Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
PHOENIX CONTACTFL MGUARD DM (2981974)1.12.0, 1.13.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.