LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-34572: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in Enbra EWM (replay attack)

Enbra EWM 1.7.29 does not check for or detect replay attacks sent by wireless M-Bus Security mode 5 devices. Instead timestamps of the sensor are replaced by the time of the readout even if the data is a replay of earlier data.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Enbra EWM can accept replayed wireless meter data as if it were fresh. This can make old readings appear current because the system uses the readout time rather than detecting that the sensor data was reused. The business risk is incorrect operational or billing decisions based on manipulated meter integrity, not data theft or service outage.

Executive priority

Prioritize assessment where EWM readings influence billing, compliance reporting, energy operations, or customer trust. This is a data-integrity issue with localized attack requirements, so urgency depends on how directly meter readings drive financial or operational decisions.

Technical view

CVE-2021-34572 is CWE-345 in Enbra EWM 1.7.29, version 03.11.2019. The software does not detect replayed wireless M-Bus Security mode 5 device data and replaces sensor timestamps with readout time. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5 with adjacent-network attack vector and high integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to organizations using Enbra EWM 1.7.29 with wireless M-Bus Security mode 5 devices. The CVE source bundle does not identify other Enbra products, cloud services, or later versions as affected.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. The attack vector is adjacent, so risk is highest where an attacker can interact with local wireless M-Bus communications.

Researcher notes

The public record names one affected product/version and describes replay acceptance, but does not provide a vendor patch, exploit status, or broad product matrix. Avoid extrapolating beyond Enbra EWM 1.7.29 and wireless M-Bus Security mode 5 contexts.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify whether Enbra EWM 1.7.29 version 03.11.2019 is deployed.
  • Check Enbra or system integrator guidance for updates, replacements, or compensating controls.
  • Treat affected meter readings as integrity-sensitive until replay detection is confirmed.
  • Reconcile EWM readings against independent operational or billing records.
  • Restrict physical and radio proximity access around affected metering environments.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory EWM installations and record exact software version and deployment role.
  • Confirm whether wireless M-Bus Security mode 5 devices feed the system.
  • Review whether sensor timestamps are preserved or overwritten during readout.
  • Check for repeated or stale readings presented as current values.
  • Ask the vendor whether the deployed build detects replayed device data.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-34572 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-34572Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
EnbraEWM 1.7.2903.11.2019Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-345 · source CWE mapping

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.