LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-33304: Double Free vulnerability in virtualsquare picoTCP v1.7.0 and picoTCP-NG v2.1 in modules/pico_fragments.c i...

Double Free vulnerability in virtualsquare picoTCP v1.7.0 and picoTCP-NG v2.1 in modules/pico_fragments.c in function pico_fragments_reassemble, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes a critical memory-management bug in virtualsquare picoTCP v1.7.0 and picoTCP-NG v2.1. A remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to trigger arbitrary code execution. Business urgency depends on whether these TCP/IP stacks are embedded in your products, firmware, or appliances.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for environments with embedded networked devices, but start with exposure confirmation. The severity is critical, yet the public metadata is sparse and does not identify all downstream products.

Technical view

The issue is a CWE-415 double free in modules/pico_fragments.c, specifically pico_fragments_reassemble. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in embedded, IoT, appliance, or firmware environments that include picoTCP v1.7.0 or picoTCP-NG v2.1. The source bundle does not provide CPEs or a complete affected-product list.

Exploitation context

The CVE description states arbitrary code execution is possible. The source bundle does not cite CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation, so active exploitation should not be assumed from these sources.

Researcher notes

The key evidence is the CVE record and referenced GitHub issue. Product metadata is incomplete, with vendor/product listed as n/a in the bundle. Avoid broad downstream claims unless confirmed by SBOM, source review, or vendor statement.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory products and firmware for picoTCP v1.7.0 or picoTCP-NG v2.1.
  • Check upstream and device-vendor guidance for fixed releases or supported mitigations.
  • Prioritize firmware updates or vendor replacements where affected stacks are confirmed.
  • Reduce network exposure for affected embedded systems until remediation is available.
  • Segment or isolate affected devices from untrusted networks where operationally feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Review SBOMs, firmware manifests, and source dependencies for picoTCP or picoTCP-NG.
  • Ask suppliers whether their products include the affected stack versions.
  • Check code or binary provenance for modules/pico_fragments.c where authorized.
  • Confirm exposed services using affected firmware are reachable only from expected networks.
  • Track vendor advisories because the source bundle does not name a patch.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-415: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-33304 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-33304Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-415 · source CWE mapping

Double Free

Double Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.