LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-3329: DOS: Incorrect handling of the initial HCI ACL_MTU handshake packet leads to crash of bluetooth host layer

Lack of proper validation in HCI Host stack initialization can cause a crash of the bluetooth stack

CriticalCVSS 9.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-3329 affects Zephyr’s Bluetooth host stack. Improper validation during HCI host initialization can crash the Bluetooth stack when handling the initial ACL_MTU handshake packet. For products using Zephyr with Bluetooth enabled, this is primarily an availability risk within Bluetooth range.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for Bluetooth-enabled Zephyr products, especially operational or customer-facing devices. The severity is critical, but urgency depends on confirmed Zephyr use, Bluetooth exposure, and whether vendor guidance identifies the deployed version as affected.

Technical view

The issue is classified under CWE-703: improper handling of exceptional conditions. The CVSS 3.1 vector is adjacent-network, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, scope changed, with confidentiality low, integrity high, and availability high impact. Public source detail does not identify affected Zephyr versions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in embedded or IoT products built on Zephyr that enable the Bluetooth host stack. The affected versions are listed only as unspecified, so teams need SBOM, firmware, and vendor advisory review to confirm exposure.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates exploitation from an adjacent network, consistent with Bluetooth-range access. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Public details support a crash condition, but do not provide complete exploit status or version scope.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: the public description names a Bluetooth HCI initialization validation failure and crash, but affected versions are unspecified. The CVSS vector suggests adjacent, unauthenticated attack conditions. Do not assume active exploitation or a specific patch without confirming Zephyr advisory details.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Zephyr ZEPSEC-117 and vendor guidance for affected branches and fixes.
  • Update affected Zephyr-based firmware to a vendor-supported fixed release when identified.
  • Disable Bluetooth on products where it is not required.
  • Prioritize devices where Bluetooth disruption affects safety, operations, or customer availability.
  • Track downstream OEM advisories for products embedding Zephyr.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory products and firmware builds that include Zephyr.
  • Confirm whether the Bluetooth host stack is enabled in each build.
  • Map deployed Zephyr versions against ZEPSEC-117 and vendor advisories.
  • Review device logs for unexplained Bluetooth stack crashes or resets.
  • Validate fixes in a lab before production firmware rollout.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-703: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-3329 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.6 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.6CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H2.86Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.6Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-3329Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
zephyrproject-rtoszephyrunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-703 · source CWE mapping

Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions

Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.