LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-32795: Denial of Service via Steam chat in ArchiSteamFarm

ArchiSteamFarm is a C# application with primary purpose of idling Steam cards from multiple accounts simultaneously. In versions prior to 4.3.1.0 a Denial of Service (aka DoS) vulnerability which allows attacker to remotely crash running ASF instance through sending a specifically-crafted Steam chat message exists. The user sending the message does not need to be authorized within the bot or ASF process. The attacker needs to know ASF's `CommandPrefix` in advance, but majority of ASF setups run with an unchanged default value. This attack does not allow attacker to gain any potentially-sensitive information, such as logins or passwords, does not allow to execute arbitrary commands and otherwise exploit the crash further. The issue is patched in ASF V4.3.1.0. The only workaround which guarantees complete protection is running all bots with `OnlineStatus` of `0` (Offline). In this setup, ASF is able to ignore even the specifically-crafted message without attempting to interpret it.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE affects ArchiSteamFarm, a Steam automation tool. A remote Steam user could crash an affected ASF instance by sending a specially crafted chat message. It is primarily an availability issue: the sources state it does not expose passwords, run commands, or enable further exploitation. The vendor fixed it in version 4.3.1.0.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate availability issue. Prioritize patching if ASF supports revenue, operations, or always-on automation. The business risk is service disruption, not data breach, based on the supplied sources.

Technical view

ASF versions 4.3.0.0 through before 4.3.1.0 mishandle Steam chat input, producing a remotely triggerable denial of service. The sender need not be authorized in ASF, but must know the CommandPrefix. Sources note many setups keep the default prefix. CWE-20 and CVSS 6.5 indicate input validation with high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to systems running affected ArchiSteamFarm versions with bots reachable through Steam chat. Risk is higher where the CommandPrefix remains default and bots are online. Organizations not using ASF, or already on 4.3.1.0 or later, are not indicated as affected by the supplied sources.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires only network reachability through Steam chat and knowledge of the command prefix, but the described outcome is a crash, not credential theft, command execution, or persistence.

Researcher notes

The advisory frames this as CWE-20 input validation in Steam chat command handling. The attacker is unauthenticated to ASF but needs the CommandPrefix. Evidence provided names the patch version and offline workaround, but does not provide evidence of exploitation in the wild.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade ArchiSteamFarm to version 4.3.1.0 or later.
  • If upgrade is delayed, set all bots OnlineStatus to 0, Offline.
  • Review vendor advisory and release notes before operational rollout.
  • Avoid assuming other mitigations unless confirmed by ASF guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all ArchiSteamFarm instances and record exact versions.
  • Confirm no instance runs version 4.3.0.0 through before 4.3.1.0.
  • Check bot configuration for OnlineStatus when temporary workaround is required.
  • Review service logs for unexpected ASF crashes around Steam chat activity.
  • Confirm patched instances remain stable after normal bot operations.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-32795 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H2.24.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-32795Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
JustArchiNETArchiSteamFarm>= 4.3.0.0, < 4.3.1.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.