LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-32737: XSS Injection in Media Collection Title was possible

Sulu is an open-source PHP content management system based on the Symfony framework. In versions of Sulu prior to 1.6.41, it is possible for a logged in admin user to add a script injection (cross-site-scripting) in the collection title. The problem is patched in version 1.6.41. As a workaround, one may manually patch the affected JavaScript files in lieu of updating.

HighCVSS 8.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's Takehigh

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects Sulu CMS before 1.6.41. A logged-in admin could place script content in a media collection title, creating a cross-site scripting risk when another user interacts with that content. The vendor patched it in 1.6.41 and also noted a manual JavaScript patch workaround.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority CMS remediation when Sulu is internet-facing or supports sensitive content operations. The fix is version-specific and available, so the main business task is identifying affected deployments and closing privileged-user abuse paths.

Technical view

CVE-2021-32737 is a CWE-79 XSS issue in Sulu’s media collection title handling before 1.6.41. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.4 with network attack vector, low complexity, high privileges required, required user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Sulu installations running versions earlier than 1.6.41, especially where admin accounts are shared, delegated, compromised, or not tightly monitored. The source bundle does not identify other affected products or supported branches.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not provide evidence of active exploitation, and KEV status is false. Exploitation requires a logged-in admin user and user interaction, which lowers broad internet wormability but remains serious for CMS environments with privileged account compromise or insider risk.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports an authenticated, high-privilege XSS in a media collection title field. Do not assume unauthenticated reachability, affected non-Sulu products, or live exploitation from this bundle. The main research gap is whether any local deployment exposes delegated admin roles with reduced trust.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Sulu installations to version 1.6.41 or later.
  • If upgrade is blocked, apply the vendor-described JavaScript workaround.
  • Restrict and audit admin access to media collection management.
  • Review media collection titles created before remediation.
  • Check vendor guidance before applying any manual patch.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Sulu versions across production, staging, and legacy CMS hosts.
  • Confirm each installation is running Sulu 1.6.41 or later.
  • Review admin activity around media collection title changes.
  • Run safe staging regression tests without executable payloads.
  • Verify the vendor advisory or release note is referenced in remediation evidence.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-32737 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.76Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.4High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-32737Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
sulusulu< 1.6.41Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.