LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-32651: LDAP injection via OneDev may leak some LDAP directory information

OneDev is a development operations platform. If the LDAP external authentication mechanism is enabled in OneDev versions 4.4.1 and prior, an attacker can manipulate a user search filter to send forged queries to the application and explore the LDAP tree using Blind LDAP Injection techniques. The specific payload depends on how the User Search Filter property is configured in OneDev. This issue was fixed in version 4.4.2.

LowCVSS 3.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OneDev versions 4.4.1 and earlier can expose limited LDAP directory information when LDAP external authentication is enabled. An authenticated attacker may manipulate LDAP search behavior, but exploitation is rated high-complexity and requires valid access. The vendor fixed the issue in OneDev 4.4.2.

Executive priority

Low but actionable. Remediate during the next normal maintenance window, faster if OneDev is exposed to broad internal users or integrates with sensitive LDAP directories. The fix is available and the affected condition is specific.

Technical view

CVE-2021-32651 is a CWE-90 LDAP injection in OneDev’s LDAP external authentication user search filter handling. A low-privileged attacker could forge queries through the application and infer parts of the LDAP tree using blind LDAP injection. Impact is limited to confidentiality, with no cited integrity or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running OneDev 4.4.1 or earlier with LDAP external authentication enabled. Instances not using LDAP external authentication are not described as affected by the source bundle. Public internet exposure is not required by the CVSS vector, but network reachability to OneDev matters.

Exploitation context

The sources do not report active exploitation, and this CVE is not marked as KEV. Exploitation requires authenticated access and depends on the local User Search Filter configuration, raising practical difficulty. Treat it as a targeted information-disclosure risk rather than a broad unauthenticated compromise path.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on version, LDAP external authentication state, and User Search Filter configuration. The advisory says payload details depend on local configuration, so avoid generic exploit assumptions. Evidence supports limited LDAP directory disclosure only; no source claims privilege escalation, code execution, or active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade OneDev to version 4.4.2 or later.
  • Identify and prioritize OneDev instances with LDAP external authentication enabled.
  • If upgrade is delayed, assess temporarily disabling LDAP external authentication per operational requirements.
  • Review OneDev’s advisory and patched commit for vendor-specific remediation details.
  • Monitor logs for unusual authentication search behavior, without relying on logs as proof of absence.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OneDev versions and confirm none are 4.4.1 or earlier.
  • Check whether LDAP external authentication is enabled on each OneDev instance.
  • Review the User Search Filter configuration for risky custom LDAP query construction.
  • Confirm patched instances authenticate LDAP users successfully after upgrade.
  • Document any remaining legacy instance and its compensating controls.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-90: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-32651 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.1CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N1.61.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.1Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-32651Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
theonedevonedev<= 4.4.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-90 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.