LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-32632: CSRF allowing modification of commands, modules, banphrases through hidden iFrames

Pajbot is a Twitch chat bot. Pajbot versions prior to 1.52 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). Hosters of the bot should upgrade to `v1.52` or `stable` to install the patch or, as a workaround, can add one modern dependency.

LowCVSS 2.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-32632 is a low-severity CSRF issue in pajbot before version 1.52. A user with a privileged authenticated session could be induced to make unintended bot administration changes, including commands, modules, and banphrases. The main business risk is unauthorized Twitch bot configuration changes, not data theft or service takeover.

Executive priority

Treat as low urgency unless pajbot controls important Twitch moderation or brand safety workflows. Patch during normal maintenance, sooner for public-facing or frequently administered bot deployments.

Technical view

pajbot versions before 1.52 are vulnerable to CWE-352 cross-site request forgery. The CVSS vector is network-accessible, low complexity, high privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, no confidentiality impact, low integrity impact, and no availability impact. Sources describe hidden iframe-based request forgery affecting command, module, and banphrase modification.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations or stream operators self-hosting pajbot versions earlier than 1.52. Risk is most relevant where privileged pajbot users are authenticated to the admin interface and can be lured into interacting with attacker-controlled web content.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Public references include an advisory and a gist reference, but exploitation should not be assumed active without additional evidence. Successful abuse requires user interaction and a privileged authenticated context.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports a narrow CSRF integrity issue in pajbot before 1.52. The affected objects are commands, modules, and banphrases. The bundle does not name broad platform impact, data exposure, availability loss, or active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade pajbot to v1.52 or the stable release channel.
  • If upgrade is delayed, consult the GitHub advisory for the dependency workaround.
  • Limit privileged pajbot administration access to trusted operators.
  • Review bot configuration changes after any suspected exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all pajbot deployments and identify versions earlier than 1.52.
  • Confirm patched systems report pajbot v1.52 or later.
  • Check whether commands, modules, or banphrases changed unexpectedly.
  • Verify teams know not to rely on unpatched pajbot admin sessions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-32632 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.4CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N0.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.4Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-32632Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
pajbotpajbot< 1.52Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.