LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-32593: A use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm vulnerability [CWE-327] in the Dynamic Tunnel Protocol o...

A use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm vulnerability [CWE-327] in the Dynamic Tunnel Protocol of FortiWAN before 4.5.9 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to decrypt and forge protocol communication messages.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-32593 affects Fortinet FortiWAN before 4.5.9. The Dynamic Tunnel Protocol used weak or risky cryptography, which may let an unauthenticated remote attacker read or forge protocol messages. This is a business risk for sites relying on FortiWAN tunnel integrity, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority infrastructure remediation. It can undermine tunnel message confidentiality and integrity without authentication, but available sources do not indicate active exploitation or availability impact. Patch exposed or business-critical FortiWAN deployments first.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-327 in FortiWAN Dynamic Tunnel Protocol before 4.5.9. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. Impact is limited confidentiality and integrity compromise, with no availability impact stated in the source bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Fortinet FortiWAN versions earlier than 4.5.9, especially where Dynamic Tunnel Protocol communication is reachable by untrusted networks. The source bundle does not identify specific deployments, default exposure, or additional affected Fortinet products.

Exploitation context

The CVE describes unauthenticated remote decryption and forgery of protocol messages. The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS temporal vector includes proof-of-concept maturity, but no operational exploit details are provided here.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is operational exposure: the public bundle does not describe protocol ports, default reachability, or detection indicators. Validation should focus on version confirmation, protocol use, and network reachability, not exploit reproduction.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade FortiWAN appliances to version 4.5.9 or later.
  • Review Fortinet PSIRT FG-IR-21-070 for current vendor guidance.
  • Prioritize remediation for FortiWAN systems reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Document any compensating controls if upgrade timing is constrained.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory FortiWAN appliances and record firmware versions.
  • Confirm no FortiWAN system remains below version 4.5.9.
  • Identify whether Dynamic Tunnel Protocol is used in affected environments.
  • Check exposure paths from untrusted networks to FortiWAN tunnel services.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-32593 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:U/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:U/RC:C3.92.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-32593Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:U/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortinet FortiWANFortiWAN before 4.5.9Listed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.