LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-32524: QSAN Storage Manager - Command Injection-3

Command injection vulnerability in QSAN Storage Manager allows remote privileged users to execute arbitrary commands. Suggest contacting with QSAN and refer to recommendations in QSAN Document.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-32524 is a critical command injection issue in QSAN Storage Manager. A privileged remote user could run arbitrary commands, potentially affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The public source bundle does not identify specific affected versions or a fixed release.

Executive priority

Prioritize this for any QSAN storage environment. The impact is critical, but exploitation requires privileged access, so focus first on exposed management planes, admin account security, and vendor remediation guidance.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-78 command injection in QSAN Storage Manager with CVSS 3.1 score 9.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H. Exploitation requires high privileges but no user interaction and may cross security scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running QSAN Storage Manager, especially where administrative access is reachable over a network. The affected version range is unspecified in the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. Risk remains serious because a privileged remote attacker could execute arbitrary commands.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: affected versions and CPEs are not provided, and the reference points to TWCERT/QSAN guidance. Avoid assuming patch availability or exploit status without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Contact QSAN and follow the referenced QSAN recommendations.
  • Check vendor advisories for fixed versions or supported mitigations.
  • Restrict Storage Manager access to trusted administrative networks.
  • Review and reduce privileged accounts with Storage Manager access.
  • Enable strong authentication and monitor privileged administrative sessions.
  • Increase backups and recovery readiness for affected storage systems.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory QSAN Storage Manager deployments and exposed management interfaces.
  • Identify installed versions and compare against current QSAN guidance.
  • Confirm administrative access is restricted to approved users and networks.
  • Review logs for unusual privileged activity or unexpected system changes.
  • Document compensating controls where vendor fix status is unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-32524 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H2.36Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-32524Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QSANStorage ManagerunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.