LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-32007: Missing security header: Referrer-Policy URL

This issue affects: Secomea GateManager Version 9.5 and all prior versions. Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in web server of Secomea GateManager to potentially leak information to remote servers.

LowCVSS 3.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

GateManager versions 9.5 and earlier may omit a browser privacy header that limits referrer sharing. An authenticated user following links from the web interface could cause URL information to be sent to another site. Business impact is limited confidentiality exposure, not system takeover or service disruption.

Executive priority

Treat as low priority unless GateManager URLs contain sensitive data or the interface is broadly accessible. Address during regular patch cycles and configuration hardening, while confirming vendor guidance because the source bundle does not name a specific fix.

Technical view

CVE-2021-32007 is a CWE-200 information exposure issue in Secomea GateManager's web server caused by missing Referrer-Policy protection. CVSS 3.1 is 3.5, with network reachability, low complexity, required privileges, and user interaction. The cited data does not describe integrity or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Secomea GateManager 9.5 or earlier is deployed and users access its web interface. Risk depends on whether sensitive values appear in URLs and whether users can navigate from the interface to remote servers that receive referrer data.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cite active exploitation. The attack scenario requires an authenticated user and user interaction, and the documented impact is limited information leakage through referrer behavior.

Researcher notes

The record identifies Secomea GateManager 9.5 and prior, CWE-200, and CVSS 3.5. The affected metadata in the bundle is sparse and partly unclear, so avoid expanding affected product scope beyond GateManager. No exploit details or active exploitation evidence are provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Secomea's cybersecurity advisory for vendor-supported remediation guidance.
  • Upgrade or patch GateManager only according to Secomea guidance.
  • Avoid placing secrets or sensitive identifiers in GateManager URLs.
  • Restrict GateManager web interface access to trusted networks and users.
  • Consider enforcing an appropriate Referrer-Policy header where vendor-supported.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory GateManager deployments and confirm whether versions are 9.5 or earlier.
  • Inspect GateManager web responses for a Referrer-Policy header.
  • Review whether sensitive data appears in web interface URLs.
  • Confirm any remediation against Secomea's advisory or support guidance.
  • Document residual exposure if vendor guidance is incomplete.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-200: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-32007 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N2.11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-32007Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SecomeaGateManager0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-200 · source CWE mapping

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.