LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-3196: An issue was discovered in Hitachi ID Bravura Security Fabric 11.0.0 through 11.1.3, 12.0.0 through 12.0.2,...

An issue was discovered in Hitachi ID Bravura Security Fabric 11.0.0 through 11.1.3, 12.0.0 through 12.0.2, and 12.1.0. When using federated identity management (authenticating via SAML through a third-party identity provider), an attacker can inject additional data into a signed SAML response being transmitted to the service provider (ID Bravura Security Fabric). The application successfully validates the signed values but uses the unsigned malicious values. An attacker with lower-privilege access to the application can inject the username of a high-privilege user to impersonate that user.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let a low-privileged user become a higher-privileged user in Hitachi ID Bravura Security Fabric when SAML federation is used. The application validates signed SAML data but may trust attacker-added unsigned values. Business risk is high because successful abuse could compromise privileged identity-management access.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for any affected identity-management deployment using SAML. The vulnerability can turn limited access into privileged impersonation, creating risk to accounts, access controls, and downstream systems. If affected versions are present, remediation should be tracked as an identity-security incident-prevention item.

Technical view

CVE-2021-3196 affects Hitachi ID Bravura Security Fabric 11.0.0 through 11.1.3, 12.0.0 through 12.0.2, and 12.1.0. In SAML authentication flows, injected unsigned data can be used after signed values validate, enabling username substitution and impersonation. CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running the listed Bravura Security Fabric versions and using federated identity management with SAML through a third-party identity provider. Systems not using the affected product or SAML federation are not shown as exposed by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. The described attack requires network reachability, a SAML authentication path, and lower-privileged application access. Impact is still serious because the target is an identity-security platform and impersonation may reach privileged roles.

Researcher notes

The key issue is a SAML signature-wrapping style trust failure: signed values validate, but unsigned attacker-controlled values are consumed. The provided sources do not include exploit telemetry, CWE mapping, or a specific fixed build in the supplied text, so validation should stay focused on version, SAML use, and vendor advisory confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Hitachi advisory guidance for fixed versions or supported configuration changes.
  • Prioritize remediation on internet-accessible or broadly reachable SAML-enabled deployments.
  • Limit access to the Bravura Security Fabric service where business operations allow.
  • Review privileged accounts for unexpected sessions or actions during the exposure window.
  • Coordinate SAML configuration review with the identity provider and Hitachi support.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Bravura Security Fabric versions across all environments.
  • Confirm whether SAML federated authentication is enabled for each deployment.
  • Identify deployments within 11.0.0-11.1.3, 12.0.0-12.0.2, or 12.1.0.
  • Review authentication logs for unexpected privileged-user session creation.
  • Confirm remediation status against Hitachi’s published advisory or support response.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-3196 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:N/A:H/C:H/I:H/PR:L/S:U/UI:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:N/A:H/C:H/I:H/PR:L/S:U/UI:N2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-3196Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:N/A:H/C:H/I:H/PR:L/S:U/UI:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.