LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-31740: SEPPMail's web frontend, user input is not embedded correctly in the web page and therefore leads to cross-...

SEPPMail's web frontend, user input is not embedded correctly in the web page and therefore leads to cross-site scripting vulnerabilities (XSS).

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-31740 is a cross-site scripting issue in SEPPMail's web frontend. If a user is persuaded to interact with a crafted page or link, attacker-controlled script could run in that user's browser context. The public bundle rates it medium severity and does not identify exact affected versions.

Executive priority

Handle as a moderate web application risk. It is not documented as actively exploited in the supplied sources, but XSS can support credential theft, session abuse, or user deception where SEPPMail portals are exposed to users.

Technical view

The CVE describes improper embedding of user input in SEPPMail's web frontend, mapped to CWE-79. CVSS 3.1 is 6.1: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to organizations running a SEPPMail web frontend. The provided sources do not list affected product identifiers, CPEs, versions, endpoints, or deployment conditions, so asset owners must verify applicability against vendor guidance.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires user interaction but no prior authentication. Treat internet-exposed web frontends as higher priority for validation.

Researcher notes

The evidence is incomplete: no CPEs, affected versions, endpoints, patch identifiers, or XSS subtype are provided in the bundle. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond the CVSS facts and the public description. Validation should focus on confirmed SEPPMail frontend assets and vendor applicability data.

Mitigation direction

  • Check SEPPMail vendor guidance for affected versions and supported fixes.
  • Review the Pentagrid advisory for available remediation context.
  • Inventory SEPPMail web frontends and confirm ownership.
  • Apply vendor-supported updates when applicability is confirmed.
  • Reduce unnecessary external exposure to the web frontend.
  • Monitor for vendor advisories if no fix is documented.

Validation and detection

  • Identify all SEPPMail web frontend deployments.
  • Confirm installed versions against vendor or advisory information.
  • Review application logs for suspicious script-like input patterns.
  • Verify current builds encode user-controlled output safely.
  • Check whether external users can reach the web frontend.
  • Document compensating controls and remaining unknowns.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-31740 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-31740Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.