LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-31627: Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Tenda AC9 V1.0 through V15.03.05.19(6318), and AC9 V3.0 V15.03.06.42_multi...

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Tenda AC9 V1.0 through V15.03.05.19(6318), and AC9 V3.0 V15.03.06.42_multi, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via the index parameter.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-31627 is a buffer overflow in specified Tenda AC9 router firmware. The CVE description says attackers can execute arbitrary code through the index parameter. For executives, treat this as a potentially serious network-edge device risk, but the provided sources do not give CVSS, a vendor fix, or confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize identification and containment of affected routers. The business concern is potential control of a network-edge device, but urgency should be balanced against incomplete exploit and patch evidence in the provided sources.

Technical view

The issue affects Tenda AC9 V1.0 through V15.03.05.19(6318) and AC9 V3.0 V15.03.06.42_multi. The reported flaw is a buffer overflow reachable through an index parameter, with arbitrary code execution impact. The source bundle does not define prerequisites, authentication state, network exposure path, CWE, or fixed versions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in environments still running the named Tenda AC9 firmware versions. Risk increases if the router management interface or vulnerable service is reachable from untrusted networks. The source bundle does not confirm whether authentication is required.

Exploitation context

The CVE is public and references a GitHub write-up, but the bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. Public technical detail exists, so defenders should not rely on obscurity.

Researcher notes

Key gaps remain: no CVSS, no CWE, no authentication requirement, no fixed version, and no official mitigation are present in the source bundle. Any validation should stay defensive and avoid reproducing exploit behavior on production devices.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Tenda AC9 routers and record exact hardware and firmware versions.
  • Check Tenda guidance for fixed firmware or replacement recommendations.
  • Restrict router administration to trusted management networks only.
  • Disable external management access if enabled.
  • Replace or isolate affected devices if no supported fix is available.

Validation and detection

  • Compare deployed firmware against the versions named in the CVE description.
  • Confirm management interfaces are not reachable from the internet.
  • Review router logs for unexpected administrative changes or reboots.
  • Verify configuration backups before firmware updates or replacement.
  • Track vendor advisories because the provided sources do not name a patch.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-31627 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.