LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-31624: Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Tenda AC9 V1.0 through V15.03.05.19(6318), and AC9 V3.0 V15.03.06.42_multi...

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Tenda AC9 V1.0 through V15.03.05.19(6318), and AC9 V3.0 V15.03.06.42_multi, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via the urls parameter.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-31624 is a reported buffer overflow in Tenda AC9 router firmware. The source says attackers may execute arbitrary code through the urls parameter. That makes affected routers potentially high-risk network edge devices, but the bundle does not include CVSS, patch status, or confirmed exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority network edge risk if affected Tenda AC9 routers are deployed. Urgency depends on exposure of management interfaces and availability of vendor remediation, both of which need confirmation.

Technical view

The CVE record describes a buffer overflow affecting Tenda AC9 V1.0 through V15.03.05.19(6318) and AC9 V3.0 V15.03.06.42_multi. The reported trigger is the urls parameter. No CWE, CVSS vector, fixed version, or vendor advisory is included in the provided sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations using the named Tenda AC9 firmware versions, especially where router management surfaces are reachable from untrusted networks. The source bundle does not identify other products or CPEs.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. A public GitHub reference is cited, but the provided evidence does not confirm active exploitation, weaponized exploit availability, or attacks in the wild.

Researcher notes

The provided record is sparse: no CVSS, CWE, CPE, vendor fix, or exploit-in-the-wild evidence is supplied. Analysis should stay tied to the named Tenda AC9 versions and the urls parameter claim.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Tenda guidance for corrected firmware or official mitigations.
  • Restrict router administration to trusted networks or VPN access only.
  • Retire or replace affected devices if no supported fixed firmware exists.
  • Disable unnecessary remote management exposure where operationally possible.
  • Monitor perimeter devices for unexpected configuration or administrator changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Tenda AC9 routers and record exact hardware and firmware versions.
  • Compare firmware against the affected versions named in the CVE description.
  • Review whether management interfaces are exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Check vendor sources for patch status before declaring remediation complete.
  • Review logs for unexplained admin access or configuration changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-31624 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.