LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-30120: 2FA bypass in Kaseya VSA <= v9.5.6

Kaseya VSA before 9.5.7 allows attackers to bypass the 2FA requirement. The need to use 2FA for authentication in enforce client-side instead of server-side and can be bypassed using a local proxy. Thus rendering 2FA useless. Detailed description --- During the login process, after the user authenticates with username and password, the server sends a response to the client with the booleans MFARequired and MFAEnroled. If the attacker has obtained a password of a user and used an intercepting proxy (e.g. Burp Suite) to change the value of MFARequered from True to False, there is no prompt for the second factor, but the user is still logged in.

CriticalCVSS 9.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Kaseya VSA versions before 9.5.7 could let an attacker with a valid password skip two-factor authentication. This turns stolen credentials into full account access despite MFA being configured, which is especially serious for managed service provider environments where VSA can administer many customer systems.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for any still-running affected VSA system. MFA bypass on an administrative platform can convert credential theft into broad operational compromise, especially for service providers managing customer environments.

Technical view

The flaw is a server-side enforcement failure: MFA requirement state was enforced client-side. After password authentication, client-controlled MFARequired/MFAEnroled values could determine whether the second factor appeared, allowing MFA bypass for a credentialed network attacker. CVSS 3.1 is 9.9 with low complexity and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Kaseya VSA before 9.5.7. Risk is highest where VSA login portals are reachable from the internet, privileged accounts use reusable passwords, or MSP workflows give VSA broad downstream administrative control.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited confirmation of active exploitation for this specific CVE. Exploitation requires valid user credentials, but once those are obtained, MFA may not provide the expected barrier on affected versions.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for affected version range and root cause from the CVE description. The bundle’s structured affected-product fields are sparse, so do not infer additional products. No exploit code, KEV status, or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation is provided in the supplied sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Kaseya VSA to 9.5.7 or later following vendor guidance.
  • Restrict VSA administrative access to trusted networks or VPN paths.
  • Reset credentials for VSA accounts if password compromise is suspected.
  • Review Kaseya and DIVD advisories for any additional required actions.
  • Prioritize privileged and MSP tenant administrator accounts first.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Kaseya VSA instances and record exact versions.
  • Confirm no production instance is running earlier than 9.5.7.
  • Review authentication logs for MFA-enabled accounts with password-only successful logins.
  • Verify MFA enforcement is server-side after remediation.
  • Check whether exposed VSA portals are reachable from untrusted networks.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-30120 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.16Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-30120Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.