LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29610: Invalid validation in `QuantizeAndDequantizeV2`

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. The validation in `tf.raw_ops.QuantizeAndDequantizeV2` allows invalid values for `axis` argument:. The validation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/eccb7ec454e6617738554a255d77f08e60ee0808/tensorflow/core/kernels/quantize_and_dequantize_op.cc#L74-L77) uses `||` to mix two different conditions. If `axis_ < -1` the condition in `OP_REQUIRES` will still be true, but this value of `axis_` results in heap underflow. This allows attackers to read/write to other data on the heap. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 3.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A TensorFlow raw operation accepted invalid axis values, causing memory access before an expected heap buffer. An attacker with local ability to run TensorFlow code could affect integrity or availability. The vendor rated this low severity and provided fixed releases for supported branches.

Executive priority

Treat as a low-priority patching item unless TensorFlow runs in shared or semi-trusted execution environments. It should be handled through normal dependency maintenance, with faster action for platforms that let multiple users submit ML workloads.

Technical view

CVE-2021-29610 affects tf.raw_ops.QuantizeAndDequantizeV2. Its axis validation mixed conditions incorrectly, allowing axis values below -1 to pass and cause heap underflow. Affected TensorFlow branches are before 2.1.4, 2.2.3, 2.3.3, and 2.4.2.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in applications, notebooks, ML pipelines, or services running affected TensorFlow versions where local users or workloads can execute TensorFlow operations. Remote exposure is not established by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector is local, high complexity, low privileges, and no user interaction. The source bundle says CISA KEV is false, and the cited sources do not report active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The root issue is incorrect OP_REQUIRES validation in quantize_and_dequantize_op.cc. The vendor commit corrects validation for invalid axis handling. Avoid assuming broader TensorFlow impact beyond the listed package and versions.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade to TensorFlow 2.5.0 or a fixed supported branch release.
  • Use TensorFlow 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, or 2.1.4 where applicable.
  • Prioritize shared ML environments where less-trusted users can run TensorFlow workloads.
  • Check vendor advisory and release guidance before applying branch-specific fixes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed TensorFlow versions across applications, notebooks, images, and CI environments.
  • Flag TensorFlow versions matching the affected ranges in the source bundle.
  • Review code paths that allow users or jobs to invoke raw TensorFlow operations.
  • Confirm remediation by verifying the deployed TensorFlow version is a fixed release.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-665: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29610 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.6 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.6CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L12.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.6Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29610Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-665 · source CWE mapping

Improper Initialization

Improper Initialization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.