LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29586: Division by zero in optimized pooling implementations in TFLite

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. Optimized pooling implementations in TFLite fail to check that the stride arguments are not 0 before calling `ComputePaddingHeightWidth`(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/3f24ccd932546416ec906a02ddd183b48a1d2c83/tensorflow/lite/kernels/pooling.cc#L90). Since users can craft special models which will have `params->stride_{height,width}` be zero, this will result in a division by zero. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 2.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This TensorFlow Lite issue can crash affected machine-learning workloads when a specially crafted model is processed. The known impact is limited availability disruption, not data theft or code execution. Business urgency is low unless the organization accepts models from users, partners, or other untrusted sources.

Executive priority

Treat as a low-priority patching item unless external model uploads are part of the business process. The main risk is localized service or application disruption, so remediation should fit normal dependency maintenance unless exposed ingestion paths exist.

Technical view

Optimized TFLite pooling code failed to reject zero stride height or width before padding calculations. A crafted model can set those parameters to zero, causing division by zero. Sources describe low CVSS 3.1 severity, local attack vector, high complexity, required privileges, and availability-only impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in systems using affected TensorFlow or TFLite versions while loading user-supplied, partner-supplied, or otherwise untrusted models. Environments using fixed TensorFlow releases or only tightly controlled internal models have lower practical risk.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or public evidence of active exploitation. The described abuse requires the ability to supply a specially crafted model to an affected local TensorFlow Lite processing path.

Researcher notes

Focus review on TFLite pooling operators in affected TensorFlow versions and model-loading trust boundaries. Do not assume remote exploitation from the provided evidence. The fix is linked to commit 5f7975d09eac0f10ed8a17dbb6f5964977725adc and planned fixed releases are named in the advisory text.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade to TensorFlow 2.5.0 or vendor backported fixed releases.
  • Apply TensorFlow 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, or 2.1.4 where applicable.
  • Restrict ingestion of untrusted TFLite models until fixed.
  • Review TensorFlow advisory for supported upgrade guidance.
  • Prioritize exposed model-ingestion services over closed internal pipelines.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory TensorFlow and TFLite versions across applications and build artifacts.
  • Compare discovered versions against the listed affected ranges.
  • Identify workflows that accept external or user-provided TFLite models.
  • Confirm patched versions are deployed in production and mobile releases.
  • Check crash telemetry for pooling-related model processing failures.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-369: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29586 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29586Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-369 · source CWE mapping

Divide By Zero

Divide By Zero represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.