LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29585: Division by zero in padding computation in TFLite

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. The TFLite computation for size of output after padding, `ComputeOutSize`(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/0c9692ae7b1671c983569e5d3de5565843d500cf/tensorflow/lite/kernels/padding.h#L43-L55), does not check that the `stride` argument is not 0 before doing the division. Users can craft special models such that `ComputeOutSize` is called with `stride` set to 0. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 2.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A specially crafted TensorFlow Lite model can cause a vulnerable TensorFlow process to hit a divide-by-zero condition during padding calculations. The documented impact is limited availability loss, not data theft or code execution.

Executive priority

Treat as routine patching unless the business accepts untrusted ML models. Prioritize internet-facing or customer-upload model processing paths first, but the sourced severity and CVSS support low urgency.

Technical view

TFLite padding output-size computation in ComputeOutSize divided by the stride argument without first ensuring stride was nonzero. Crafted models could pass stride 0 into that path. TensorFlow fixed this for 2.5.0 and planned supported-branch cherry-picks.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where applications or pipelines load untrusted, user-supplied, or third-party TFLite models using affected TensorFlow versions.

Exploitation context

No CISA KEV listing is indicated. The sources describe craftable special models but do not cite exploitation in the wild. CVSS indicates local access, high complexity, low privileges, and low availability impact.

Researcher notes

Focus review on TFLite model ingestion and version verification. The vulnerable path is ComputeOutSize in padding logic, where stride 0 was not checked before division. Sources do not provide evidence of broader product impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade to TensorFlow 2.5.0 or a fixed supported branch release.
  • Use 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, or 2.1.4 where applicable.
  • Avoid processing untrusted TFLite models until vulnerable runtimes are updated.
  • Check TensorFlow advisory guidance before relying on compensating controls.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory TensorFlow and TFLite versions in applications, containers, and build artifacts.
  • Identify workflows that load user-supplied or third-party TFLite models.
  • Confirm vulnerable ranges are absent from deployed runtime environments.
  • Review crash telemetry for divide-by-zero or TFLite padding failures.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-369: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29585 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29585Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-369 · source CWE mapping

Divide By Zero

Divide By Zero represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.