LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29584: CHECK-fail due to integer overflow

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. An attacker can trigger a denial of service via a `CHECK`-fail in caused by an integer overflow in constructing a new tensor shape. This is because the implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/0908c2f2397c099338b901b067f6495a5b96760b/tensorflow/core/kernels/sparse_split_op.cc#L66-L70) builds a dense shape without checking that the dimensions would not result in overflow. The `TensorShape` constructor(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/6f9896890c4c703ae0a0845394086e2e1e523299/tensorflow/core/framework/tensor_shape.cc#L183-L188) uses a `CHECK` operation which triggers when `InitDims`(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/6f9896890c4c703ae0a0845394086e2e1e523299/tensorflow/core/framework/tensor_shape.cc#L212-L296) returns a non-OK status. This is a legacy implementation of the constructor and operations should use `BuildTensorShapeBase` or `AddDimWithStatus` to prevent `CHECK`-failures in the presence of overflows. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 2.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-29584 is a low-severity TensorFlow denial-of-service issue. A crafted tensor shape can trigger an integer overflow path that causes TensorFlow to abort with a CHECK failure. The known impact is availability disruption, not data theft or code execution.

Executive priority

Treat as routine patching unless vulnerable TensorFlow workloads are shared, multi-user, or accept untrusted inputs. It can interrupt ML services, but available evidence does not indicate data exposure, privilege escalation, or active exploitation.

Technical view

TensorFlow SparseSplit builds a dense shape without validating overflow. The TensorShape constructor can CHECK-fail when InitDims returns an error, terminating the process. Sources name CWE-190 and affected TensorFlow ranges before patched releases 2.1.4, 2.2.3, 2.3.3, 2.4.2, and 2.5.0.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to systems running affected TensorFlow versions where an attacker can influence tensor shapes reaching the vulnerable SparseSplit path. CVSS marks exploitation as local, high complexity, requiring low privileges, with low availability impact only.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV status is false. The issue is a crash condition from malformed or oversized shape handling, useful mainly for disrupting vulnerable ML workloads rather than compromising confidentiality or integrity.

Researcher notes

Focus analysis on SparseSplit shape construction and TensorShape overflow handling. Avoid assuming remote exposure without application-specific input paths. The advisory states legacy constructors should use status-returning shape builders to prevent CHECK-triggered aborts.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade TensorFlow to 2.5.0 or the patched supported branch release.
  • Use TensorFlow 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, or 2.1.4 where branch pinning is required.
  • Inventory containers, notebooks, services, and training jobs for affected TensorFlow versions.
  • Check TensorFlow vendor guidance before using older unsupported releases.
  • Reduce exposure to untrusted tensor inputs until patched.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed TensorFlow versions are not in the listed affected ranges.
  • Review dependency lockfiles and container images for transitive TensorFlow installations.
  • Check crash logs for TensorShape, SparseSplit, InitDims, or CHECK-failure patterns.
  • Verify patched builds include the referenced TensorFlow fix commit.
  • Document remaining affected workloads and their input trust boundaries.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29584 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29584Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.