LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29582: Heap OOB read in `tf.raw_ops.Dequantize`

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. Due to lack of validation in `tf.raw_ops.Dequantize`, an attacker can trigger a read from outside of bounds of heap allocated data. The implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/26003593aa94b1742f34dc22ce88a1e17776a67d/tensorflow/core/kernels/dequantize_op.cc#L106-L131) accesses the `min_range` and `max_range` tensors in parallel but fails to check that they have the same shape. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 2.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-29582 is a low-severity TensorFlow memory safety flaw. Malformed inputs to tf.raw_ops.Dequantize can make TensorFlow read beyond heap-allocated data. The published impact is availability only, not data theft or code execution. It still matters where TensorFlow runs untrusted workloads or model-processing jobs.

Executive priority

Treat as routine patching unless TensorFlow is exposed to untrusted ML jobs or shared compute users. The issue has low severity and no cited active exploitation, but vulnerable ML platforms should be updated during the next controlled maintenance window.

Technical view

The Dequantize kernel accessed min_range and max_range tensors in parallel without validating matching shapes, causing a heap out-of-bounds read. The issue is classified as CWE-125 with CVSS 3.1 score 2.5, requiring local access, low privileges, high complexity, and affecting availability only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to TensorFlow deployments on affected versions: before 2.1.4, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.3, and 2.4.x before 2.4.2. Risk is higher for systems processing untrusted TensorFlow operations, models, tensors, or user-controlled ML inputs.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation is local, high complexity, requires low privileges, and does not require user interaction. Sources describe an out-of-bounds read trigger, but not a public weaponized exploit.

Researcher notes

The key condition is shape mismatch between min_range and max_range tensors in tf.raw_ops.Dequantize. The provided commit is the authoritative fix reference. Evidence supports availability impact only; do not expand scope to confidentiality, integrity, remote exploitation, or code execution without additional sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade TensorFlow to 2.5.0 or a fixed supported patch release.
  • Use TensorFlow 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, or 2.1.4 where those branches are required.
  • Restrict untrusted users from submitting arbitrary TensorFlow operations or model artifacts.
  • Check TensorFlow security advisory guidance for environment-specific recommendations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory TensorFlow versions across applications, notebooks, containers, and training pipelines.
  • Flag affected version ranges listed in the advisory and CVE record.
  • Review whether untrusted inputs can reach tf.raw_ops.Dequantize.
  • Confirm patched versions are deployed in runtime and build environments.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-125: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29582 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29582Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-125 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Read

Out-of-bounds Read represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.