LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29581: Segfault in `CTCBeamSearchDecoder`

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. Due to lack of validation in `tf.raw_ops.CTCBeamSearchDecoder`, an attacker can trigger denial of service via segmentation faults. The implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/a74768f8e4efbda4def9f16ee7e13cf3922ac5f7/tensorflow/core/kernels/ctc_decoder_ops.cc#L68-L79) fails to detect cases when the input tensor is empty and proceeds to read data from a null buffer. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 2.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-29581 is a low-severity TensorFlow denial-of-service issue. A malformed empty tensor passed to a specific CTC beam search decoder operation can crash the process. Business impact is mainly service disruption in systems that expose this TensorFlow operation to untrusted inputs.

Executive priority

Treat as routine remediation unless the affected operation is exposed in shared or user-facing ML services. Prioritize normal dependency upgrade cycles and verify production TensorFlow versions.

Technical view

TensorFlow failed to validate empty input tensors in tf.raw_ops.CTCBeamSearchDecoder. The kernel could read from a null buffer and segfault. The advisory lists affected 2.1.x, 2.2.x, 2.3.x, and 2.4.x release ranges, with fixes planned in 2.5.0 and supported patch branches.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in ML services, notebooks, or pipelines running affected TensorFlow versions and allowing low-privileged local users or user-controlled model inputs to reach CTCBeamSearchDecoder.

Exploitation context

The provided CVSS vector is local, high complexity, low privilege, no user interaction, and low availability impact only. The source bundle does not indicate known active exploitation, and KEV is false.

Researcher notes

This is a memory-safety availability flaw from missing input validation, mapped to CWE-908. Evidence supports denial of service through segmentation fault, not data disclosure, privilege escalation, or remote code execution.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade TensorFlow to 2.5.0 or a patched supported branch release.
  • Use 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, or 2.1.4 where branch pinning is required.
  • Review TensorFlow vendor guidance before relying on compensating controls.
  • Reject empty tensors before invoking the affected decoder operation if upgrade is delayed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory TensorFlow package versions across production, CI, notebooks, and container images.
  • Search application code for use of tf.raw_ops.CTCBeamSearchDecoder.
  • Confirm deployed versions are outside the affected ranges listed in the advisory.
  • Review service crash logs for decoder-related segmentation faults.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-908: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29581 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29581Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-908 · source CWE mapping

Use of Uninitialized Resource

Use of Uninitialized Resource represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.