LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29578: Heap buffer overflow in `FractionalAvgPoolGrad`

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. The implementation of `tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPoolGrad` is vulnerable to a heap buffer overflow. The implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/dcba796a28364d6d7f003f6fe733d82726dda713/tensorflow/core/kernels/fractional_avg_pool_op.cc#L216) fails to validate that the pooling sequence arguments have enough elements as required by the `out_backprop` tensor shape. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 2.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in TensorFlow’s FractionalAvgPoolGrad operation can let a local, low-privileged user or workload trigger a heap buffer overflow. The published impact is low: no confidentiality or integrity loss is identified, and availability impact is limited.

Executive priority

Treat as routine patching unless TensorFlow is exposed to untrusted users or shared multi-tenant ML workloads. The business risk is mainly process disruption, not data theft.

Technical view

TensorFlow fails to validate that pooling sequence arguments contain enough elements for the out_backprop tensor shape in tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPoolGrad. This can cause a heap buffer overflow. The CVSS 3.1 vector is local, high complexity, low privilege, no user interaction, with low availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant in systems running affected TensorFlow versions that process untrusted graphs, models, or tensor inputs. Single-user controlled ML environments are lower concern.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation is described as local, high complexity, and requiring low privileges.

Researcher notes

The key validation point is missing length checking for pooling sequence arguments versus out_backprop shape in FractionalAvgPoolGrad. The cited commit is the relevant remediation evidence; avoid assuming broader product impact beyond TensorFlow.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade TensorFlow to 2.5.0 or the fixed supported branch release.
  • Use TensorFlow 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, or 2.1.4 where applicable.
  • Restrict untrusted users from submitting arbitrary TensorFlow graphs or models.
  • Isolate ML workloads that process untrusted inputs.
  • Check TensorFlow advisory guidance before deploying fixes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory TensorFlow versions in applications, notebooks, containers, and training workers.
  • Flag versions below 2.1.4 and affected 2.2.x, 2.3.x, and 2.4.x releases.
  • Review whether services expose TensorFlow execution to untrusted users or tenants.
  • Confirm upgraded deployments report a fixed TensorFlow version.
  • Run regression tests for ML workloads after upgrading.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29578 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29578Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.