LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29573: Division by 0 in `MaxPoolGradWithArgmax`

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. The implementation of `tf.raw_ops.MaxPoolGradWithArgmax` is vulnerable to a division by 0. The implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/279bab6efa22752a2827621b7edb56a730233bd8/tensorflow/core/kernels/maxpooling_op.cc#L1033-L1034) fails to validate that the batch dimension of the tensor is non-zero, before dividing by this quantity. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 2.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-29573 is a low-severity TensorFlow availability bug. A crafted or unusual tensor shape can cause a divide-by-zero condition in a TensorFlow pooling-gradient operation, potentially crashing affected local workloads. It does not expose data or alter results according to the supplied CVSS vector.

Executive priority

Treat as routine patch management unless TensorFlow runs shared or user-supplied ML workloads. Business risk is mainly limited service disruption, not data theft or privilege compromise based on supplied evidence.

Technical view

TensorFlow tf.raw_ops.MaxPoolGradWithArgmax failed to validate that the tensor batch dimension was non-zero before division. Affected versions are before 2.1.4, 2.2.0 before 2.2.3, 2.3.0 before 2.3.3, and 2.4.0 before 2.4.2. The fix was included in 2.5.0 and supported patch releases.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where affected TensorFlow versions run local, authenticated, or controlled ML workloads that can reach MaxPoolGradWithArgmax. Internet-facing exposure is not established in the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV status is false. CVSS indicates local access, high attack complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and low availability impact only.

Researcher notes

The key issue is missing validation around a zero batch dimension before division in maxpooling_op.cc. Analysis should stay focused on availability impact and version confirmation; the provided sources do not support broader affected products or active exploitation claims.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade TensorFlow to 2.5.0 or a listed patched supported release.
  • Patch 2.4.x to 2.4.2, 2.3.x to 2.3.3, 2.2.x to 2.2.3, or 2.1.x to 2.1.4.
  • Check TensorFlow advisory guidance before using any unsupported branch.
  • Restrict execution of untrusted models or tensor inputs in shared ML environments.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed TensorFlow package versions across applications, notebooks, images, and training workers.
  • Confirm affected ranges are absent from lockfiles, containers, and runtime environments.
  • Review whether workloads invoke MaxPoolGradWithArgmax directly or through model layers.
  • Check reliability logs for unexplained TensorFlow worker crashes, without treating them as exploitation proof.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-369: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29573 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29573Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-369 · source CWE mapping

Divide By Zero

Divide By Zero represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.