LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29552: CHECK-failure in `UnsortedSegmentJoin`

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. An attacker can cause a denial of service by controlling the values of `num_segments` tensor argument for `UnsortedSegmentJoin`. This is because the implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/a2a607db15c7cd01d754d37e5448d72a13491bdb/tensorflow/core/kernels/unsorted_segment_join_op.cc#L92-L93) assumes that the `num_segments` tensor is a valid scalar. Since the tensor is empty the `CHECK` involved in `.scalar<T>()()` that checks that the number of elements is exactly 1 will be invalidated and this would result in process termination. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

LowCVSS 2.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-29552 is a TensorFlow denial-of-service issue. If an attacker can influence a specific TensorFlow tensor argument, they may cause the process to terminate. The published severity is low because the CVSS vector requires local access, low privileges, high complexity, and only affects availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as a low-priority availability risk unless TensorFlow workloads are multi-tenant or accept untrusted ML inputs. Patch during normal maintenance, but accelerate remediation for shared research platforms, hosted notebooks, or production ML services where a crash could disrupt customer workloads.

Technical view

TensorFlow’s UnsortedSegmentJoin assumed num_segments was a valid scalar. An empty tensor could invalidate an internal CHECK in scalar<T>()(), terminating the process. The issue is classified as CWE-617 and is fixed in TensorFlow 2.5.0 with cherry-picked fixes for supported 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, and 2.1.4 branches.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most plausible in systems running affected TensorFlow versions where local or authenticated users can submit TensorFlow graphs, code, or tensor inputs. Shared notebooks, ML platforms, and batch inference or training jobs deserve review. Ordinary web applications are only exposed if they pass user-controlled data into this operation.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not identify public exploitation, weaponized tooling, or KEV listing. The impact described is process termination, not data theft or code execution. The CVSS vector indicates local attack, low privileges, high complexity, no user interaction, and low availability impact.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on TensorFlow package versions and reachability of UnsortedSegmentJoin. The vulnerable behavior is a CHECK failure on an empty num_segments tensor, causing termination. Do not assume remote exposure unless the deployment lets an attacker influence TensorFlow execution inputs. KEV is false in the provided bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade TensorFlow to 2.5.0 or a fixed supported branch release.
  • Patch affected branches to 2.4.2, 2.3.3, 2.2.3, or 2.1.4 as applicable.
  • Restrict who can submit TensorFlow code, graphs, or arbitrary tensor inputs.
  • Check vendor guidance before using unsupported older TensorFlow versions.
  • Prioritize shared ML execution environments over isolated developer workstations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory TensorFlow versions in applications, notebooks, containers, and training images.
  • Flag versions matching the published vulnerable ranges.
  • Identify code paths using UnsortedSegmentJoin with user-influenced tensors.
  • Confirm runtime environments use fixed TensorFlow builds.
  • Review crash logs for TensorFlow CHECK-failure process terminations.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-617: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29552 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.5CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.5Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29552Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
tensorflowtensorflow< 2.1.4, >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.3, >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-617 · source CWE mapping

Reachable Assertion

Reachable Assertion represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.