LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29478: Vulnerability in the COPY command for large intsets

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. An integer overflow bug in Redis 6.2 before 6.2.3 could be exploited to corrupt the heap and potentially result with remote code execution. Redis 6.0 and earlier are not directly affected by this issue. The problem is fixed in version 6.2.3. An additional workaround to mitigate the problem without patching the `redis-server` executable is to prevent users from modifying the `set-max-intset-entries` configuration parameter. This can be done using ACL to restrict unprivileged users from using the `CONFIG SET` command.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Redis 6.2.0 through 6.2.2 contains an integer overflow that can corrupt memory and may allow remote code execution. The issue requires low Redis privileges and high attack complexity, but Redis often supports business-critical caching and queues, so exposed affected instances should be treated as high priority.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-accessible or shared Redis services first, then internal affected deployments. The patch is identified, the affected range is narrow, and the potential impact includes remote code execution, making this a practical high-priority maintenance item.

Technical view

CVE-2021-29478 is a CWE-190 integer overflow in Redis 6.2 before 6.2.3 involving the COPY command and large intsets. The advisory describes possible heap corruption and potential remote code execution. Redis 6.0 and earlier are not directly affected by this issue.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Redis versions 6.2.0, 6.2.1, and 6.2.2. Risk is higher where users can issue Redis commands and change set-max-intset-entries using CONFIG SET. Inventory should include packaged Redis from Linux distributions and any self-managed Redis deployments.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show known active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. Exploitation is assessed as high complexity and requires low privileges, but successful exploitation could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on version identification, ACL posture, and whether users can alter set-max-intset-entries. The source bundle supports patching to 6.2.3 and an ACL-based workaround; it does not provide evidence of in-the-wild exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Redis 6.2 deployments to version 6.2.3 or later.
  • Restrict unprivileged users from using CONFIG SET through Redis ACLs.
  • Prevent users from modifying set-max-intset-entries where patching is delayed.
  • Review Fedora, Gentoo, or relevant OS package advisories for distribution fixes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Redis versions and flag 6.2.0 through 6.2.2.
  • Review Redis ACLs for permission to run CONFIG SET.
  • Check whether set-max-intset-entries can be modified by unprivileged users.
  • Confirm patched package versions on Fedora, Gentoo, or other managed hosts.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29478 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.65.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-29478Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
redisredis>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.