LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-29246: BTCPay Server through 1.0.7.0 suffers from directory traversal, which allows an attacker with admin privile...

BTCPay Server through 1.0.7.0 suffers from directory traversal, which allows an attacker with admin privileges to achieve code execution. The attacker must craft a malicious plugin file with special characters to upload the file outside of the restricted directory.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

BTCPay Server through 1.0.7.0 had a directory traversal flaw in plugin upload handling. An attacker already holding admin privileges could place a malicious plugin file outside the intended restricted directory and achieve code execution. This is serious for exposed payment infrastructure, but the available bundle does not show public exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for BTCPay environments because successful abuse can become code execution on payment infrastructure. The prerequisite admin access reduces broad internet-scale risk, but compromised admin accounts would make impact severe. Prioritize inventory, vendor-guided remediation, and admin access review.

Technical view

The CVE describes directory traversal in BTCPay Server through 1.0.7.0. The abuse path requires administrative privileges and a specially crafted plugin file containing special characters, allowing upload outside the intended directory and leading to code execution. No CVSS, CWE, affected CPE, or fixed version details are provided in the bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where BTCPay Server instances at or below 1.0.7.0 allowed admin users to upload plugins. Risk depends heavily on admin account security, plugin upload availability, and whether the instance has followed BTCPay release or disclosure guidance.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not cite active exploitation, and KEV is false. The described condition is post-authentication: the attacker must have admin privileges before abusing plugin upload path handling. Evidence is insufficient to assess exploit prevalence or public weaponization.

Researcher notes

The record is thin: no CVSS vector, CWE mapping, CPE list, or explicit fixed version appears in the supplied bundle. The key evidence is the CVE description, BTCPay release reference, and BTCPay disclosure reference. Avoid assuming exploit availability or remediation specifics beyond vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory BTCPay Server deployments and identify versions through 1.0.7.0.
  • Review BTCPay release notes and vulnerability disclosure for the vendor-supported fix path.
  • Restrict admin access to trusted users and strongly protected accounts.
  • Disable or tightly govern plugin uploads until remediation is confirmed.
  • Review existing plugins and remove anything untrusted or unexpected.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each BTCPay Server version against the affected through-1.0.7.0 range.
  • Verify vendor disclosure or release guidance has been applied.
  • Review admin account access history for unusual or unauthorized activity.
  • Inspect plugin inventory for unexpected additions or suspicious file placement.
  • Check change records for plugin uploads around relevant dates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-29246 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.