LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-28511: This advisory documents the impact of an internally found vulnerability in Arista EOS for security ACL bypass. The impact of this vulnerability is that the security ACL drop rule might be bypassed if a NAT ACL rule filter with permit action matches t ...

This advisory documents the impact of an internally found vulnerability in Arista EOS for security ACL bypass. The impact of this vulnerability is that the security ACL drop rule might be bypassed if a NAT ACL rule filter with permit action matches the packet flow. This could allow a host with an IP address in a range that matches the range allowed by a NAT ACL and a range denied by a Security ACL to be forwarded incorrectly as it should have been denied by the Security ACL. This can enable an ACL bypass.

MediumCVSS 5.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-28511 is an Arista EOS ACL bypass issue. In affected configurations, traffic that should be blocked by a Security ACL may be forwarded if it also matches a NAT ACL permit rule. The business risk is unintended network access across controls that operators expect to enforce segmentation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate network-control integrity issue. Prioritize environments using affected Arista EOS versions for segmentation, boundary filtering, or regulated network separation, especially where NAT and Security ACLs overlap.

Technical view

Arista describes an internally found EOS flaw where NAT ACL permit matching can override the intended Security ACL drop behavior for the same packet flow. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, scope changed, and low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Arista EOS versions listed in the bundle: 4.24.0, 4.25.0, 4.26.0, and 4.27.0. Practical exposure depends on configurations where NAT ACL permit rules overlap traffic ranges denied by Security ACLs.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The described condition is configuration-dependent and could allow forwarding that violates intended ACL policy, but the provided sources do not prove public exploit activity.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports an ACL precedence or enforcement failure involving NAT ACL permit and Security ACL drop logic. The source bundle does not include fixed versions, workarounds, affected hardware scope, or exploit telemetry, so remediation details should be confirmed against the Arista advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Arista advisory for affected and fixed EOS release guidance.
  • Upgrade or apply vendor-recommended remediation once confirmed from Arista guidance.
  • Remove overlap between NAT ACL permit filters and Security ACL denied ranges where feasible.
  • Add upstream or downstream enforcement for denied traffic until EOS remediation is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Arista EOS devices running 4.24.0, 4.25.0, 4.26.0, or 4.27.0.
  • Review NAT ACL permit filters for overlap with Security ACL drop rules.
  • Validate policy enforcement in an authorized test environment without exposing production paths.
  • Check flow telemetry for traffic forwarded despite matching denied Security ACL ranges.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-28511 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N3.91.4Arista

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.8Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-28511Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Arista NetworksEOS4.24.0, 4.25.0, 4.26.0, 4.27.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.