LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-28490: In OWASP CSRFGuard through 3.1.0, CSRF can occur because the CSRF cookie may be retrieved by using only a s...

In OWASP CSRFGuard through 3.1.0, CSRF can occur because the CSRF cookie may be retrieved by using only a session token.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OWASP CSRFGuard through 3.1.0 may fail at its core purpose: preventing forged web requests. The CVE says an attacker may retrieve the CSRF cookie using only a session token, enabling CSRF in affected deployments. Business urgency depends on whether any applications still use this library/version and what privileged actions those apps expose.

Executive priority

Treat this as an exposure-discovery item with potentially meaningful application risk. There is no provided evidence of active exploitation or a CVSS score, but affected deployments may undermine CSRF protection for sensitive web workflows.

Technical view

The reported issue affects OWASP CSRFGuard through 3.1.0. The CVE states CSRF can occur because the CSRF cookie may be retrieved with only a session token. The source bundle does not provide CVSS, CWE, affected CPEs, confirmed fixed versions, exploit status, or detailed product scope beyond OWASP CSRFGuard.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Java web applications that deployed OWASP CSRFGuard through version 3.1.0. The provided affected-product metadata is incomplete, so teams should verify actual dependency, embedded library, and configuration usage rather than relying on CPE matching.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The weakness is relevant where attackers can induce authenticated users to submit unwanted requests and the affected CSRFGuard behavior protects sensitive actions.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are severity scoring, CWE mapping, precise affected package identifiers, exploit status, and fixed-version guidance. Research should focus on confirming deployed version, how the CSRF cookie is derived or exposed, and whether sensitive state-changing endpoints rely on affected CSRFGuard behavior.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications for OWASP CSRFGuard through version 3.1.0.
  • Review OWASP CSRFGuard project guidance and release notes for fixed or supported versions.
  • Prioritize applications with administrative, payment, account, or data-change workflows.
  • Use compensating CSRF controls only after application security review.
  • Document any accepted risk where replacement or upgrade is delayed.

Validation and detection

  • Check dependency manifests, bundled JARs, and vendor packages for CSRFGuard versions.
  • Confirm whether CSRFGuard protects public routes or authenticated state-changing routes.
  • Review application logs for unusual state-changing requests from authenticated sessions.
  • Verify remediation against vendor guidance before closing exposure.
  • Record evidence because CVE metadata lacks CVSS and CPE detail.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-28490 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.