LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-27445: Mesa Labs AmegaView Improper Privilege Management

Mesa Labs AmegaView Versions 3.0 and prior has insecure file permissions that could be exploited to escalate privileges on the device.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Mesa Labs AmegaView 3.0 and earlier has unsafe file permissions that may let a low-privileged local user gain higher privileges on the device. For organizations using this product in regulated or operational environments, the concern is loss of control and integrity on affected systems.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority operational technology remediation item if AmegaView is deployed. It requires local access, but successful abuse could compromise device confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Technical view

CVE-2021-27445 is an improper privilege management issue, mapped to CWE-269. The CVSS 3.1 vector is local, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, unchanged scope, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running Mesa Labs AmegaView versions 3.0 and prior. The CVSS vector indicates local access is required; the provided sources do not indicate remote exploitation or broad internet-facing exposure.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not cite active exploitation, and the issue is not marked as CISA KEV. Exploitation context should be treated as local privilege escalation risk, not confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.

Researcher notes

Available evidence identifies insecure file permissions in AmegaView 3.0 and prior. The bundle does not provide exploit details, confirmed exploitation, CPEs, or a named fixed version, so validation should focus on asset/version confirmation and vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all Mesa Labs AmegaView deployments and installed versions.
  • Prioritize systems running AmegaView 3.0 or earlier for remediation review.
  • Check Mesa Labs and CISA ICS guidance for vendor-approved fixes or mitigations.
  • Restrict local user access to affected devices until remediation is confirmed.
  • Monitor affected hosts for unexpected privilege changes or file permission modifications.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether AmegaView is installed on operational systems.
  • Record exact installed version and compare against 3.0 and prior exposure.
  • Review file permissions against vendor or CISA guidance when available.
  • Verify only authorized users have local access to affected devices.
  • Document compensating controls where vendor remediation is unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-27445 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-27445Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Mesa LabsAmegaViewunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.