LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-27102: Accellion FTA 9_12_411 and earlier is affected by OS command execution via a local web service call.

Accellion FTA 9_12_411 and earlier is affected by OS command execution via a local web service call. The fixed version is FTA_9_12_416 and later.

HighCVSS 7.8Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-27102 lets a low-privileged local attacker run operating-system commands on vulnerable Accellion FTA appliances. The vendor source states FTA 9_12_411 and earlier are affected, with FTA_9_12_416 and later fixed. Because CISA lists it in KEV, treat past or present vulnerable deployments as potentially targeted.

Executive priority

Prioritize within active vulnerability management because this is known exploited and can fully compromise affected systems. Business urgency is highest where Accellion FTA handled sensitive file transfers or remained on vulnerable versions after disclosure.

Technical view

This is CWE-78 OS command injection in Accellion FTA through a local web service call. CVSS 3.1 is 7.8 with local access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The public bundle does not provide exploit mechanics, indicators, or detailed compensating controls.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations that deployed Accellion FTA 9_12_411 or earlier. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires local access and low privileges, not purely unauthenticated remote access. Confirm whether any FTA instance existed, including retired or isolated systems.

Exploitation context

Active exploitation is supported by CISA KEV listing for CVE-2021-27102. The provided sources do not identify attacker groups, exploitation volume, timelines, or technical indicators. Avoid assuming current compromise solely from version presence, but prioritize investigation where vulnerable FTA was used.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is evidence depth: the bundle confirms affected and fixed versions, CVSS, CWE, and KEV status, but not exploit details, indicators, or vendor mitigation beyond upgrading. Validation should focus on version evidence, asset history, and local access assumptions.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Accellion FTA to FTA_9_12_416 or later.
  • Check Accellion guidance for product-specific remediation steps.
  • Confirm unsupported or retired FTA systems are decommissioned.
  • Review CISA KEV guidance and required remediation timelines.
  • Preserve relevant logs before changing vulnerable systems.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all current and historical Accellion FTA deployments.
  • Verify installed FTA version against 9_12_411 and FTA_9_12_416.
  • Check whether vulnerable systems had local user access paths.
  • Review logs for suspicious command execution or service activity.
  • Document remediation status for vulnerability management tracking.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-27102 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-27102Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.