LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-26403: Insufficient checks in SEV may lead to a malicious hypervisor disclosing the launch secret potentially resu...

Insufficient checks in SEV may lead to a malicious hypervisor disclosing the launch secret potentially resulting in compromise of VM confidentiality.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue affects AMD SEV protections on some EPYC platforms. A malicious or compromised hypervisor may be able to disclose a VM launch secret, weakening VM confidentiality. The business risk is concentrated where SEV is relied on to protect sensitive workloads from the host operator or host compromise.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted confidentiality risk, not a broad internet emergency. Prioritize validation where AMD SEV protects sensitive tenant, regulated, or high-value workloads from host-level access.

Technical view

CVE-2021-26403 is an AMD SEV insufficient-checks issue classified under CWE-345. The source bundle describes potential launch secret disclosure by a malicious hypervisor, with CVSS 3.1 score 6.5 and confidentiality impact high. Integrity and availability impacts are not indicated.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on environments using AMD SEV on referenced 1st Gen or 2nd Gen EPYC platforms and related AGESA firmware. The provided sources do not identify specific cloud services, operating systems, or application products.

Exploitation context

No CISA KEV listing or cited source in the bundle indicates active exploitation. The described attacker position is a malicious hypervisor, so practical risk depends heavily on host control, virtualization trust boundaries, and SEV deployment.

Researcher notes

The bundle supports confidentiality impact through launch secret disclosure, but does not provide exploit details, public exploitation evidence, or complete fixed-version data. Further analysis should start with AMD-SB-1032 and platform-specific OEM firmware information.

Mitigation direction

  • Review AMD-SB-1032 for affected platform and AGESA guidance.
  • Inventory AMD EPYC hosts where SEV is enabled or required.
  • Check OEM firmware advisories for applicable AGESA updates.
  • Prioritize systems hosting sensitive confidential-computing workloads.
  • Reassess whether SEV alone satisfies host-trust assumptions.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm CPU generation and platform firmware versions on virtualization hosts.
  • Identify workloads relying on AMD SEV confidentiality guarantees.
  • Compare host firmware status against AMD and OEM guidance.
  • Verify hypervisor administration is restricted and monitored.
  • Document unaffected systems separately from unverified systems.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-26403 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N24Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-26403Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
AMD1st Gen EPYCAGESA, variousunaffected
AMD2nd Gen EPYCAGESA, variousunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-345 · source CWE mapping

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.