LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-26277: Security Advisory | PendingIntent hijacking vulnerability in Framework Services

The framework service handles pendingIntent incorrectly, allowing a malicious application with certain privileges to perform privileged actions.

MediumCVSS 5.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

On affected vivo Android devices, a malicious app with some privileges could abuse incorrect PendingIntent handling in the Framework/Frame service to perform privileged actions. The main concern is data exposure, with high confidentiality impact in the CVSS vector. The issue is local and requires user interaction, so it is not described as a remote network worm risk.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation if vivo devices are used for business data, executives, field staff, or BYOD access. The vulnerability is medium severity, but the confidentiality impact is high. If vivo devices are not present, record non-exposure and monitor vendor guidance.

Technical view

CVE-2021-26277 is a PendingIntent hijacking issue in vivo Frame service version 2021.6.30. The published CVSS 3.1 score is 5.6: local attack vector, low complexity, low privileges required, user interaction required, unchanged scope, high confidentiality impact, low integrity impact, and no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Likely exposure is limited to environments with vivo devices using the affected Frame service version 2021.6.30. The provided sources do not identify broader Android, non-vivo, or later-version exposure. Organizations without managed vivo mobile devices likely have low direct exposure, but BYOD fleets should still be checked.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or public active exploitation evidence. Exploitation would require local app execution, some privileges, and user interaction. Treat this as a targeted mobile risk until vendor or threat-intelligence sources provide stronger evidence.

Researcher notes

The public description is sparse and does not provide model lists, fixed versions, or detailed root-cause evidence in the source bundle. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond PendingIntent hijacking in vivo Frame service 2021.6.30. Validate against vendor advisory data before making fleet-wide conclusions.

Mitigation direction

  • Check vivo security advisory guidance for affected models and available updates.
  • Update affected vivo devices to a vendor-supported fixed firmware or security release.
  • Restrict installation of untrusted or sideloaded Android applications.
  • Use MDM controls to inventory vivo devices and enforce update compliance.
  • Review BYOD policy coverage for unmanaged vivo devices.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory vivo devices and identify Frame service or firmware versions.
  • Compare device versions against vivo advisory details for CVE-2021-26277.
  • Confirm affected devices have received vendor-recommended security updates.
  • Review MDM logs for sideloading, risky app sources, or unusual app permissions.
  • Document any devices that cannot be updated and apply compensating controls.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-26277 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.6 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.6CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N1.34.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.6Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-26277Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
vivoFrame service2021.6.30Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.