LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-25682: apport improperly parses /proc/pid/status

It was discovered that the get_pid_info() function in data/apport did not properly parse the /proc/pid/status file from the kernel.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-25682 affects Canonical apport, Ubuntu’s crash reporting tool. A local low-privileged user could exploit improper parsing of kernel process status data to cross a security boundary, with potential confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact according to the CVSS score.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority local privilege-boundary issue for Ubuntu systems, especially shared servers and developer environments. It is not described as remotely exploitable from the internet, but local access could turn into broad system impact.

Technical view

The issue is in apport’s get_pid_info() function, which improperly parses /proc/pid/status from the kernel. The supplied CVSS vector is local, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, scope changed, and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Ubuntu systems with Canonical apport installed at the listed affected versions: 2.20.1, 2.20.9, 2.20.11-0ubuntu27, or 2.20.11-0ubuntu50. The attack vector is local, so risk increases where untrusted users or workloads can run code on the host.

Exploitation context

The supplied data does not show CISA KEV listing or any cited evidence of active exploitation. The risk is still material because the CVSS vector indicates local, low-complexity exploitation by a low-privileged user without user interaction.

Researcher notes

Key evidence is limited to the CVE description, CVSS vector, affected apport versions, and Launchpad reference. The bundle does not provide exploit details, fixed package versions, or confirmed mitigations, so validation should focus on version exposure and Canonical guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Ubuntu systems with apport installed.
  • Compare installed apport versions against the affected version list.
  • Apply Canonical or Ubuntu apport updates when available.
  • Restrict local shell access to trusted users and workloads.
  • Review vendor guidance before using nonstandard workarounds.

Validation and detection

  • Check whether apport is installed on Linux hosts.
  • Record the installed apport package version.
  • Confirm affected versions are remediated through vendor guidance.
  • Prioritize shared servers, developer hosts, and multi-user systems.
  • Track remediation status separately from internet exposure.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-25682 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H26Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-25682Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Canonicalapport2.20.1, 2.20.9, 2.20.11-0ubuntu27, 2.20.11-0ubuntu50Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.