LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-24503: Popular Brand SVG Icons - Simple Icons < 2.7.8 - Contributor+ Stored XSS

The Popular Brand Icons – Simple Icons WordPress plugin before 2.7.8 does not sanitise or validate some of its shortcode parameters, such as "color", "size" or "class", allowing users with a role as low as Contributor to set Cross-Site payload in them. A post made by a contributor would still have to be approved by an admin to have the XSS triggered in the frontend, however, higher privilege users, such as editor could exploit this without the need of approval, and even when the blog disallows the unfiltered_html capability.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This WordPress plugin flaw lets a lower-privileged site user plant malicious script content through icon shortcode settings. A contributor would need an admin to approve the post before visitors see it, while an editor could publish it directly. The source bundle does not report active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate web-content integrity issue. Prioritize updates on public WordPress sites with multiple content authors, because successful abuse could run script in visitors’ browsers and undermine trust in the site.

Technical view

Popular Brand Icons – Simple Icons before 2.7.8 does not sanitize or validate some shortcode parameters, including color, size, and class. The issue is stored XSS, mapped to CWE-79. Exploitation requires authenticated content access at Contributor level or higher, with publication requirements depending on role.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running Popular Brand Icons – Simple Icons before 2.7.8, especially sites allowing contributors, editors, or other non-admin users to create posts using plugin shortcodes.

Exploitation context

The cited description supports authenticated stored XSS, not unauthenticated compromise. Contributor-created content must be approved by an admin before frontend triggering; higher-privileged publishers such as editors may trigger it without approval. No KEV listing or cited source indicates active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited but clear on the vulnerable pattern: unsanitized shortcode parameters leading to stored XSS. The available sources do not provide CVSS metrics, exploit status, or detailed vendor remediation beyond the before-2.7.8 version boundary.

Mitigation direction

  • Update Popular Brand Icons – Simple Icons to 2.7.8 or later.
  • Check vendor or WPScan guidance for any additional remediation notes.
  • Restrict contributor and editor access until vulnerable versions are removed.
  • Review pending and published posts containing plugin shortcodes.
  • Disable the plugin if updating is not immediately possible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Popular Brand Icons – Simple Icons.
  • Confirm installed plugin versions are not before 2.7.8.
  • Review shortcode usage for unusual color, size, or class values.
  • Check whether contributor or editor roles can publish affected content.
  • Verify no cited source shows KEV-listed active exploitation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-24503 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
UnknownPopular Brand Icons – Simple Icons2.7.8Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.