LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-24021: An improper neutralization of input vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiAnalyzer versions 6.4.3 and below, 6.2.7...

An improper neutralization of input vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiAnalyzer versions 6.4.3 and below, 6.2.7 and below and 6.0.10 and below may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the column settings of Logview in FortiAnalyzer, should the attacker be able to obtain that POST request, via other, hypothetical attacks.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-24021 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. An authenticated attacker could tamper with Logview column settings so malicious content is stored and later rendered. The source describes limited impact: integrity only, with no confidentiality or availability impact in the CVSS vector.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority management-plane hardening and upgrade item. It is not described as actively exploited or unauthenticated, but FortiAnalyzer is security infrastructure, so affected systems should be identified and remediated through vendor guidance.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-79 improper input neutralization in FortiAnalyzer Logview column settings. A remote authenticated attacker may perform stored XSS if they can obtain the relevant POST request through other hypothetical attacks. Affected versions listed are FortiAnalyzer 6.4.3 and below, 6.2.7 and below, and 6.0.10 and below.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in organizations running FortiAnalyzer management interfaces on affected 6.4, 6.2, or 6.0 releases with accounts available to non-administrative or less-trusted users. Internet exposure is not stated in the sources, but remote network access and authentication are part of the CVSS conditions.

Exploitation context

The CVE record does not show CISA KEV listing, and the provided sources do not establish active exploitation. Exploitation requires an authenticated attacker and also depends on obtaining a specific POST request through other hypothetical attacks, which narrows practical abuse compared with unauthenticated XSS.

Researcher notes

The strongest constraints are PR:L and the unusual dependency on obtaining the Logview column-settings POST request through other hypothetical attacks. Sources do not provide exploit details, observed exploitation, or explicit fixed releases in the supplied bundle, so validation should stay version- and access-control focused.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify FortiAnalyzer instances running affected 6.4, 6.2, or 6.0 versions.
  • Review Fortinet advisory FG-IR-20-098 for vendor-confirmed fixed versions and upgrade guidance.
  • Restrict FortiAnalyzer access to trusted administrative networks and approved users.
  • Review privileged and low-privilege FortiAnalyzer account access for unnecessary exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory FortiAnalyzer versions and compare them with the affected version list.
  • Confirm whether Logview access is available to low-trust authenticated users.
  • Review FortiAnalyzer access controls and management-interface network exposure.
  • Check Fortinet guidance before marking any specific version as remediated.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-24021 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:F/RL:X/RC:X

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:F/RL:X/RC:X2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-24021Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:F/RL:X/RC:X

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortinet FortiAnalyzerFortiAnalyzer 6.4.3, 6.4.2, 6.4.1, 6.4.0, 6.2.7, 6.2.6, 6.2.5, 6.2.4, 6.2.3, 6.2.2, 6.2.1, 6.2.0, 6.0.10, 6.0.9, 6.0.8, 6.0.7, 6.0.6, 6.0.5, 6.0.4, 6.0.3, 6.0.2, 6.0.1, 6.0.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.