LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-23282: Stored Cross-site Scripting reported in Intelligent Power Manager v1

Eaton Intelligent Power Manager (IPM) prior to 1.70 is vulnerable to stored Cross site scripting. The vulnerability exists due to insufficient validation of input from certain resources by the IPM software. The attacker would need access to the local Subnet and an administrator interaction to compromise the system

MediumCVSS 5.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Eaton Intelligent Power Manager before version 1.70 can store unsafe input that later runs as script in the product interface. The source says compromise requires local subnet access and administrator interaction, so internet-wide urgency is lower, but exposed power-management consoles still deserve prompt attention.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate internal-risk item. Prioritize remediation for IPM systems reachable from broad corporate networks or supporting critical power operations, while avoiding emergency internet-exposure assumptions not supported by the sources.

Technical view

CVE-2021-23282 is stored cross-site scripting in Eaton IPM prior to 1.70, caused by insufficient validation of input from certain resources. CVSS 3.1 score is 5.2 with adjacent-network access, high privileges, low integrity impact, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Most likely exposure is internal or local-subnet access to Eaton IPM management systems running versions prior to 1.70. The bundle does not identify cloud, SaaS, or unrelated Eaton products as affected.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not support active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires local subnet access and administrator interaction according to the description, limiting opportunistic remote risk but not insider or compromised-host scenarios.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE record and Eaton advisory reference. The exact affected input resources, exploit primitives, and vendor remediation details are not included in the source bundle, so validation should remain version, exposure, and advisory driven.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Eaton IPM deployments and identify versions prior to 1.70.
  • Review Eaton’s advisory for the supported update path and maintenance guidance.
  • Upgrade or retire IPM instances confirmed vulnerable by Eaton guidance.
  • Restrict IPM access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Limit administrator access to users with a current operational need.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each IPM instance version against the vulnerable prior-to-1.70 range.
  • Check whether IPM interfaces are reachable from untrusted or broad internal networks.
  • Review administrative logs for unexpected configuration or resource changes.
  • Verify vendor remediation was applied after upgrade or other Eaton guidance.
  • Document any compensating network controls for systems awaiting remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-23282 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.2CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H0.94.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.2Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-23282Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
EatonIntelligent Power Manager (IPM)0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.