LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-22959: The parser in accepts requests with a space (SP) right after the header name before the colon.

The parser in accepts requests with a space (SP) right after the header name before the colon. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS) in llhttp < v2.1.4 and < v6.0.6.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets some malformed HTTP headers be accepted by llhttp, the parser used by Node.js. In proxy or load-balancer setups, inconsistent parsing can enable HTTP request smuggling, where one system sees a different request boundary than another.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority hygiene issue for public web and API platforms. It is not confirmed exploited in the provided evidence, but request smuggling can undermine perimeter controls and affect confidentiality, routing, and access boundaries.

Technical view

CVE-2021-22959 is a CWE-444 HTTP request smuggling issue. llhttp before v2.1.4 and before v6.0.6 accepts a space after a header name before the colon, creating parser disagreement risk across HTTP chains. The source bundle lists NodeJS Node versions 4.0 through 16.0.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Node.js or embedded llhttp handles inbound HTTP behind proxies, CDNs, API gateways, or load balancers. Source data identifies llhttp version ranges and NodeJS Node versions, but does not provide a complete deployment-specific impact matrix.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The risk is structural: request smuggling can bypass routing, caching, or security controls when front-end and back-end HTTP parsers disagree.

Researcher notes

Focus analysis on parser differentials across each HTTP hop. The source evidence is specific to acceptance of whitespace before the header colon in llhttp ranges; do not generalize to unrelated Node.js parser issues without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Node.js runtimes and embedded llhttp versions across internet-facing services.
  • Upgrade llhttp to versions outside the listed vulnerable ranges where directly embedded.
  • Apply vendor-provided Node.js, Debian, Oracle, or appliance updates relevant to your environment.
  • Prioritize systems behind proxies, CDNs, gateways, or load balancers.
  • Check current vendor advisories before assuming a backported package is fixed.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm runtime and package versions against vendor advisories and asset inventory.
  • Verify Debian systems include the fixes referenced by DSA-5170 where applicable.
  • Review Oracle product exposure against the January 2022 Critical Patch Update.
  • Check HTTP edge and application logs for anomalous malformed header patterns.
  • Run regression testing for HTTP parsing after applying vendor updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-444: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-22959 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
NodeJSNode4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0, 13.0, 14.0, 15.0, 16.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-444 · source CWE mapping

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.