LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-21594: Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2 - 9.1.0.x contain a use of get request method with sensitive query str...

Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2 - 9.1.0.x contain a use of get request method with sensitive query strings vulnerability. It can lead to potential disclosure of sensitive data. Dell recommends upgrading at your earliest opportunity.

HighCVSS 8.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Dell PowerScale OneFS 8.2.2 through 9.1.0.x may expose sensitive data because sensitive values are placed in URL query strings. URLs are commonly stored in logs, browser history, monitoring tools, and proxies, so disclosure can spread beyond the original request path.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for any affected PowerScale storage clusters because storage platforms often hold critical business data, and leaked query-string values can persist in many logging systems. Upgrade planning should be treated as a high-priority operational risk reduction task.

Technical view

CVE-2021-21594 is a CWE-598 issue in Dell PowerScale OneFS involving sensitive query strings sent with HTTP GET. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.2 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. Public details do not identify affected endpoints or exact disclosed data.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments running Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2 through 9.1.0.x. Risk is higher where OneFS management or web/API traffic passes through shared logging, monitoring, proxy, or support collection systems.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or any cited active exploitation. Treat exploitation status as unconfirmed. The CVSS vector indicates remote unauthenticated reachability, but public sources provided do not include exploit details.

Researcher notes

Available evidence is sparse. The public record gives product range, CWE-598, CVSS, and Dell's upgrade recommendation, but not vulnerable endpoints, fixed builds, request examples, or exploit observations. Avoid assuming broader Dell products are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all Dell PowerScale OneFS clusters and record their running versions.
  • Upgrade affected OneFS versions following Dell advisory 000190408.
  • Review Dell guidance for fixed versions and any environment-specific precautions.
  • Restrict access to OneFS management interfaces to trusted administrative networks.
  • Limit retention and sharing of logs that may contain sensitive URLs.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm no production cluster runs OneFS 8.2.2 through 9.1.0.x.
  • Check Dell advisory 000190408 for the applicable upgrade target.
  • Review web, proxy, and monitoring logs for sensitive query-string exposure.
  • Verify management/API interfaces are not internet-exposed.
  • Confirm logging controls reduce capture of sensitive URL parameters where possible.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-598: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-21594 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H3.94.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-21594Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
DellPowerScale OneFS8.2.2 - 9.1.0.xListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-598 · source CWE mapping

Use of HTTP Request With Sensitive Query String

Use of HTTP Request With Sensitive Query String represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.