LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-21045: Acrobat Reader DC Improper Installer Access Control Vulnerability Could Lead To Privilege Escalation

Acrobat Reader DC versions versions 2020.013.20074 (and earlier), 2020.001.30018 (and earlier) and 2017.011.30188 (and earlier) are affected by an improper access control vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to elevate privileges in the context of the current user.

HighCVSS 8.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-21045 is a high-severity Adobe Acrobat Reader DC installer access-control flaw. A local attacker could use it to gain elevated privileges in the context of the current user, increasing workstation compromise risk.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority endpoint patching issue. It is not described as internet-exploitable, but privilege escalation can turn a user-level foothold into broader business impact.

Technical view

Affected Acrobat Reader DC versions 2020.013.20074 and earlier, 2020.001.30018 and earlier, and 2017.011.30188 and earlier have improper access control. CVSS 3.1 is 8.2 with local access, low complexity, low privileges, and user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is mainly endpoints running affected Acrobat Reader DC versions, especially where users can launch installers or update workflows. Servers are unlikely unless Reader is installed interactively.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV status or evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates local exploitation requiring some user interaction, not a remote unauthenticated network attack.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to CVE metadata and Adobe’s advisory reference. Do not assume exploit availability, fixed build numbers, or mitigations beyond vendor guidance without consulting APSB21-09 directly.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory endpoints for affected Acrobat Reader DC versions.
  • Review Adobe APSB21-09 for the vendor-approved update path.
  • Prioritize updates on shared, kiosk, and high-privilege-user workstations.
  • Restrict unnecessary local installer execution where operationally feasible.
  • Monitor Adobe guidance for any revised remediation details.

Validation and detection

  • Check installed Acrobat Reader DC versions against affected version thresholds.
  • Confirm patched endpoints no longer report affected builds.
  • Review software deployment logs for successful Adobe remediation.
  • Validate high-risk workstation groups were included in patch scope.
  • Check vulnerability scanner detections after remediation cycles complete.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-21045 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.56Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-21045Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
AdobeAcrobat Readerunspecified, unspecified, unspecified, unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.