LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1616: Cisco IOS XE Software H.323 Application Level Gateway Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the H.323 application level gateway (ALG) used by the Network Address Translation (NAT) feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the ALG. This vulnerability is due to insufficient data validation of traffic that is traversing the ALG. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted traffic to a targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the ALG and open connections that should not be allowed to a remote device located behind the ALG. Note: This vulnerability has been publicly discussed as NAT Slipstreaming.

MediumCVSS 4.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-1616 lets crafted traffic bypass Cisco IOS XE's H.323 NAT helper, potentially opening connections to systems behind the NAT that should remain blocked. Business impact is mainly firewall/NAT policy bypass, not direct device takeover. The source bundle does not identify specific affected versions.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted edge-control bypass issue. Prioritize internet-facing or partner-facing NAT devices, especially where H.323 is unnecessary. It is not described as actively exploited in the supplied sources, but it can weaken segmentation assumptions.

Technical view

The flaw is insufficient data validation in the H.323 ALG used by Cisco IOS XE NAT. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send crafted traffic, with user interaction required per CVSS, to bypass ALG controls and allow unintended connections behind the device. Cisco notes it has been publicly discussed as NAT Slipstreaming.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Cisco IOS XE devices using NAT where H.323 ALG traffic can traverse the device. The provided sources list Cisco IOS XE Software but do not provide version ranges or CPEs, so inventory validation against Cisco guidance is required.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not marked KEV in the supplied bundle. Public discussion as NAT Slipstreaming is noted, but the provided sources do not state active exploitation. CVSS 4.7 reflects remote unauthenticated reachability, low complexity, required user interaction, changed scope, and low integrity impact.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE record and Cisco advisory reference. The bundle does not include affected version ranges, workaround text, or fixed release details. Validation should focus on IOS XE NAT plus H.323 ALG exposure and then defer remediation specifics to Cisco's advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for affected and fixed IOS XE releases.
  • Map IOS XE NAT deployments that permit H.323 ALG traversal.
  • Upgrade affected devices according to Cisco guidance when confirmed.
  • Restrict unnecessary H.323 traffic where operationally feasible.
  • Monitor edge policy logs for unexpected connections through NAT.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco IOS XE devices providing NAT services.
  • Confirm whether H.323 ALG is enabled or reachable.
  • Compare software versions with Cisco's advisory.
  • Review NAT policies for unintended inbound connection paths.
  • Check logs for anomalous H.323-related NAT behavior.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-693: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1616 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.7Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-1616Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco IOS XE Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-693 · source CWE mapping

Protection Mechanism Failure

Protection Mechanism Failure represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.