LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1601: Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance IPv4 and IPv6 Forwarding Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to access sensitive internal services from an external interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient restrictions for IPv4 or IPv6 packets that are received on the external management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending specific traffic to this interface on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access sensitive internal services and make configuration changes on the affected device.

HighCVSS 8.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-1601 affects Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance. A nearby unauthenticated attacker could reach sensitive internal services through the external management interface and potentially change device configuration. The issue is high severity because compromise could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority infrastructure exposure if Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance is present. Prioritize scoping and vendor-guided remediation because successful exploitation could permit configuration changes on affected appliances.

Technical view

The vulnerability is caused by insufficient restrictions on IPv4 or IPv6 packets received on the external management interface. It maps to CWE-284 and has CVSS 3.1 score 8.3 with adjacent-network attack vector, no privileges, and no user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments running Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance. Risk is highest where the external management interface is reachable from untrusted or broadly shared adjacent network segments.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not identify active exploitation, and KEV status is false. Exploitation is described as requiring an adjacent attacker to send specific traffic to the affected management interface.

Researcher notes

The public summary does not provide exploit details, affected version granularity, or a named fixed release. Validation should focus on product presence, management-interface reachability, IPv4 and IPv6 exposure, and Cisco advisory alignment.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected releases and vendor-recommended remediation.
  • Restrict management interface access to trusted administrative network segments.
  • Reduce adjacent network exposure around the external management interface.
  • Monitor appliance configuration and management-plane access for unexpected changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance is deployed.
  • Identify interfaces used for external management access.
  • Check whether untrusted adjacent networks can reach the management interface.
  • Compare appliance status against Cisco advisory guidance.
  • Review logs and configuration history for unexpected management-plane activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1601 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H2.85.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.3High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-1601Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Intersight Virtual Appliancen/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.