LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1581: Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller Command Injection and File Upload Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web UI and API endpoints of Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) or Cisco Cloud APIC could allow a remote attacker to perform a command injection or file upload attack on an affected system. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco APIC and Cisco Cloud APIC web UI/API flaws could let a highly privileged remote user run injected commands or upload files. The main business risk is compromise of the controller’s confidentiality and integrity, not service outage. Treat this as important where APIC administration is broadly reachable or many users hold high privileges.

Executive priority

Prioritize this for network infrastructure teams, especially if APIC manages critical datacenter policy. It is not KEV-listed in the provided sources, but successful abuse by a privileged attacker could undermine controller trust and policy integrity.

Technical view

CVE-2021-1581 covers multiple Cisco APIC or Cloud APIC web UI/API vulnerabilities involving command injection and file upload. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5, network-accessible, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, with high confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments running Cisco APIC or Cisco Cloud APIC with reachable web UI/API endpoints. Risk increases if administrative interfaces are accessible beyond trusted management networks or if high-privilege APIC accounts are widely assigned.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation. Exploitation requires high privileges, which reduces broad internet-scale risk but makes insider, stolen credential, or over-privileged account scenarios more relevant.

Researcher notes

The public bundle lacks affected version ranges, fixed releases, and detailed per-bug mechanics. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond the CVSS vector and Cisco description. Validation should focus on product presence, exposure of management endpoints, privilege model, and Cisco advisory mapping.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco advisory cisco-sa-capic-mdvul-HBsJBuvW for affected releases and vendor fixes.
  • Restrict APIC web UI/API access to trusted management networks.
  • Reduce high-privilege APIC accounts to users with a current operational need.
  • Harden authentication and monitor privileged APIC sessions.
  • Check vendor guidance before applying any workaround or upgrade path.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco APIC and Cisco Cloud APIC deployments.
  • Compare installed releases against Cisco’s advisory details.
  • Confirm web UI/API endpoints are not exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Review privileged account assignments and recent changes.
  • Check APIC logs for unexpected privileged web UI/API activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1581 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N1.25.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-1581Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC)n/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.