LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1578: Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in an API endpoint of Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) and Cisco Cloud Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (Cloud APIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges to Administrator on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to an improper policy default setting. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a non-privileged credential for Cisco ACI Multi-Site Orchestrator (MSO) to send a specific API request to a managed Cisco APIC or Cloud APIC device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain Administrator credentials on the affected device.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-1578 lets an authenticated remote attacker with non-privileged Cisco ACI MSO credentials elevate to Administrator on affected Cisco APIC or Cloud APIC devices. That can compromise fabric management control and expose sensitive network operations. It is high severity because privilege escalation can lead to full device control.

Executive priority

Prioritize for Cisco ACI environments because successful exploitation can turn a low-privileged MSO account into Administrator access on APIC or Cloud APIC. Urgency is high where management interfaces are broadly reachable or MSO credentials are widely distributed.

Technical view

The issue is an improper policy default setting in an APIC or Cloud APIC API endpoint. A low-privileged MSO credential can be used to send a specific API request to a managed device, potentially obtaining Administrator credentials. CVSS 3.1 is 8.8: network attack, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, high CIA impact.

Likely exposure

Likely exposure is Cisco ACI environments using Cisco APIC or Cloud APIC with Cisco ACI Multi-Site Orchestrator integration. The source bundle does not include affected release ranges, so teams must verify exposure against Cisco’s advisory and their deployed versions.

Exploitation context

The bundle says exploitation requires authentication with a non-privileged MSO credential and remote access to the managed APIC or Cloud APIC API. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided data, and no cited source in the bundle states active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sufficient for vulnerability mechanics and impact, but incomplete for affected release ranges and fix details in the supplied bundle. Avoid assuming internet-wide exploitability; exposure depends on APIC or Cloud APIC deployment, MSO integration, credential access, and management API reachability.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected releases and fixed software guidance.
  • Apply vendor-recommended updates or workarounds where Cisco identifies them.
  • Restrict APIC and Cloud APIC API access to trusted management networks.
  • Review MSO account permissions and remove unused or excessive credentials.
  • Monitor for unexpected administrator credential creation or privilege changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco APIC and Cloud APIC deployments connected to MSO.
  • Compare deployed versions and configurations with Cisco’s advisory.
  • Confirm low-privileged MSO accounts cannot perform administrator-level actions.
  • Review audit logs for suspicious API access or privilege escalation events.
  • Validate management API exposure is limited to approved administrative paths.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-636: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1578 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-1578Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC)n/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-636 · source CWE mapping

Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')

Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.