LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1576: Cisco Business Process Automation Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Business Process Automation (BPA) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges to Administrator. These vulnerabilities are due to improper authorization enforcement for specific features and for access to log files that contain confidential information. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities either by submitting crafted HTTP messages to an affected system and performing unauthorized actions with the privileges of an administrator, or by retrieving sensitive data from the logs and using it to impersonate a legitimate privileged user. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to Administrator.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco BPA had authorization flaws that could let a logged-in remote user become an administrator. The issue affects the web management interface and could expose confidential log data useful for impersonating privileged users. This is high business risk where BPA is deployed, especially if many users can reach the management interface.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority if Cisco BPA is in use. The vulnerability can turn a basic authenticated foothold into administrator control, creating material risk to process automation integrity and sensitive operational data.

Technical view

CVE-2021-1576 covers multiple improper authorization enforcement issues in Cisco Business Process Automation. An authenticated remote attacker with low privileges could send crafted HTTP messages for unauthorized administrative actions or retrieve sensitive log data to impersonate a privileged user. CVSS 3.1 is 8.8, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Cisco Business Process Automation with reachable web-based management interfaces. The source bundle does not identify affected versions, so product inventory and Cisco advisory review are necessary.

Exploitation context

The sources describe authenticated remote privilege escalation, not unauthenticated compromise. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source here confirms active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The bundle attributes the issue to CWE-285 improper authorization. Evidence does not include affected version ranges, fixed versions, or public exploit status. Validation should remain defensive and focus on inventory, authorization boundaries, log access, and vendor advisory mapping.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected and fixed-release guidance.
  • Prioritize remediation for BPA systems reachable from broad or untrusted networks.
  • Restrict BPA management interface access to trusted administrative users and networks.
  • Review privileged BPA accounts for unnecessary access.
  • Monitor BPA logs and administrator actions for suspicious activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Cisco BPA deployments and management interface exposure.
  • Confirm installed BPA state against Cisco advisory guidance.
  • Review logs for unexpected access to sensitive log files.
  • Check for unexpected administrator actions or account changes.
  • Validate that non-admin accounts cannot perform admin-only BPA functions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-285: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1576 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-1576Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Business Process Automation (BPA)n/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-285 · source CWE mapping

Improper Authorization

Improper Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.