LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1440: Cisco IOS XR Software BGP Resource Public Key Infrastructure Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the implementation of the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) feature of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) process to crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to the incorrect handling of a specific RPKI to Router (RTR) Protocol packet header. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by compromising the RPKI validator server and sending a specifically crafted RTR packet to an affected device. Alternatively, the attacker could use man-in-the-middle techniques to impersonate the RPKI validator server and send a specifically crafted RTR response packet over the established RTR TCP connection to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition because the BGP process could constantly restart and BGP routing could become unstable.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.This advisory is part of the September 2021 release of the Cisco IOS XR Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication. For a complete list of the advisories and links to them, see .

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can make Cisco IOS XR routers running BGP with RPKI crash their BGP process. The business impact is routing instability or loss of availability, not data theft. Exploitation is constrained because the attacker needs to compromise or impersonate the RPKI validator path.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted availability risk for core routing infrastructure. It is not broadly exploitable from any internet host, but affected production routers using RPKI should be upgraded because a successful attack can destabilize BGP routing.

Technical view

Cisco IOS XR incorrectly handles a specific RPKI-to-Router Protocol packet header. A crafted RTR response from a compromised validator, or a man-in-the-middle impersonating it on an established RTR TCP connection, can crash BGP and cause repeated restarts. Cisco rates it CVSS 6.8, medium severity.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Cisco IOS XR deployments using the RPKI feature with affected releases listed in the source bundle, including 6.5.x, 6.6.x, 7.0.x, 7.1.x, and 7.2.x variants. Devices not using RPKI are not indicated as exposed by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. Practical exploitation requires either a compromised RPKI validator server or successful impersonation of that validator over the established RTR TCP connection.

Researcher notes

The key conditions are RPKI enabled, affected IOS XR software, and attacker influence over the RTR validator response path. The source bundle names the bug class as CWE-617 and identifies availability impact only. No exploit code, public exploitation, or workaround is provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply Cisco IOS XR software updates that address this vulnerability.
  • Do not rely on a workaround; Cisco states none addresses this issue.
  • Prioritize routers using RPKI for production BGP routing.
  • Review RPKI validator integrity, access controls, and network path trust.
  • Monitor BGP process restarts and routing instability during remediation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco IOS XR versions against the affected releases in the advisory.
  • Confirm whether the RPKI feature is enabled on each IOS XR device.
  • Verify the device is running a Cisco-fixed software release.
  • Check logs and telemetry for BGP crashes or repeated restarts.
  • Review configured RPKI validator endpoints and RTR session paths.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-617: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1440 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H2.24Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-1440Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco IOS XR Software6.6.1, 6.5.3, 7.0.1, 6.6.11, 6.5.1, 6.5.2, 6.6.2, 6.6.12, 6.6.25, 7.1.1, 7.0.90, 6.6.3, 7.0.2, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.0.11, 7.0.12, 7.0.14, 6.6.4, 7.2.12, 7.2.2unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-617 · source CWE mapping

Reachable Assertion

Reachable Assertion represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.