LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1402: Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software SSL Decryption Policy Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the software-based SSL/TLS message handler of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a reload of an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of SSL/TLS messages when the device performs software-based SSL decryption. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SSL/TLS message through an affected device. SSL/TLS messages sent to an affected device do not trigger this vulnerability. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a process to crash. This crash would then trigger a reload of the device. No manual intervention is needed to recover the device after the reload.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2021-1402 can make an affected Cisco Firepower Threat Defense device reload when it handles certain SSL/TLS traffic under software-based SSL decryption. The business impact is interruption of security gateway availability, not data theft or tampering based on the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority where FTD devices sit on critical network paths and perform SSL decryption. The main risk is security gateway downtime and traffic disruption, with automatic recovery after reload according to Cisco.

Technical view

Cisco describes insufficient validation in the software-based SSL/TLS message handler of FTD Software. An unauthenticated remote attacker could cause a process crash and device reload by passing crafted SSL/TLS traffic through an affected device while software-based SSL decryption is active. Traffic sent directly to the device is not the trigger.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Cisco FTD deployments configured to perform software-based SSL decryption on transit SSL/TLS traffic. FTD devices without that feature path enabled may not be exposed based on the provided description.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. Exploitation would affect availability by causing process crash and reload; the provided sources do not indicate confidentiality or integrity impact.

Researcher notes

The source bundle gives the vulnerable condition and impact, but not affected version ranges or fixed releases. Avoid assuming exploit availability. Validate exposure by configuration and role: the trigger is transit SSL/TLS processing during software-based decryption, not management traffic to the device.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Cisco FTD deployments using software-based SSL decryption policies.
  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected releases and vendor-recommended remediation.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-edge or high-traffic inspection points.
  • Monitor FTD reloads and process crashes until remediation is complete.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco FTD versions and SSL decryption policy usage.
  • Confirm whether affected devices inspect transit SSL/TLS traffic using software-based decryption.
  • Check logs and uptime history for unexpected reloads or related process crashes.
  • Track remediation status against Cisco’s advisory, not inferred version assumptions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1402 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-1402Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Firepower Threat Defense Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.