LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1236: Multiple Cisco Products Snort Application Detection Engine Policy Bypass Vulnerability

Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort application detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured policies on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the detection algorithm. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets that would flow through an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured policies and deliver a malicious payload to the protected network.

MediumCVSS 4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue can let certain network traffic slip past Snort-based application detection policies. For leadership, the concern is not direct system takeover, but weakened network enforcement: traffic expected to be blocked could reach protected systems. The provided sources do not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority network control weakness. Prioritize internet-edge, partner-facing, and high-value internal segmentation points where policy bypass could expose sensitive systems.

Technical view

CVE-2021-1236 is a Cisco-reported policy bypass in the Snort application detection engine, caused by a detection algorithm flaw. An unauthenticated remote attacker could send crafted packets through an affected system and bypass configured policies, potentially delivering malicious content. CVSS is 4.0 with high attack complexity.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software or Snort packages referenced by Debian advisories inspect and enforce application policies on routed traffic. The bundle does not provide affected version ranges, so asset owners must confirm scope against vendor advisories.

Exploitation context

The issue is remotely reachable and unauthenticated, but rated high complexity. Successful exploitation requires traffic to flow through an affected inspection point. The source bundle and KEV status do not support a claim of known active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports policy bypass, not code execution or denial of service. Version and fixed-release detail is not included in the supplied bundle. Use vendor advisories for exact scope. Avoid assuming exploitation beyond the unauthenticated crafted-packet scenario described.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco advisory for affected releases and fixed-release guidance.
  • Apply relevant Cisco updates where affected products are confirmed.
  • Apply Debian Snort security updates where Debian packages are in scope.
  • Use compensating controls for critical segments until vendor fixes are applied.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco FTD and Snort deployments enforcing application policies.
  • Compare installed versions against Cisco and Debian advisory scope.
  • Confirm policy enforcement after updates using approved validation tests.
  • Review security logs for unexpected allowed traffic against blocked application policies.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-670: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1236 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N2.21.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

4Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2021-1236Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Firepower Threat Defense Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-670 · source CWE mapping

Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation

Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.